See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 15 July 2008
discussion of what's required to make progress
pauld: need to reply to
commenters, prepare issue list for Basic
... having decided to publish Advanced as a note, we're freer
to put more content
jonc: George, you need more feedback from the WG on the patterns you've prepared
gcowe: that would be nice
jonc: are we happy with the granularity of Advanced patterns
pauld: I'm mostly interested in Basic, are we comfortable with Advanced
jonc: I'd like a formal review of
the Advanced patterns
... are we confident the Advanced patterns haven't broken the
Basic patterns
pauld: the patterns and examples pages flag up incorrect attribution as red "status" http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/
AttributeTypeReference and SequenceSequenceElement seem to be "basic" but detected as "advanced"
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/SequenceSequenceElement/
SequenceSequenceElement should be Advanced
AttributeTypeReference looks a little over engineered
concerned there's no canonical example for GlobalElementComplexType
pauld: worried we're going to
have to rerun the test report
... if we make wholesale changes to examples such this
<Yves> if we need to add patterns to Basic, we still have the possibility to do a short CR
I don't think this example can be basic thanks to Decimal type
I suspect that GlobalElementComplexType is, however, basic
pauld: propose that the example put in the spec doesn't include Decimal
gcowe: need to rebuild the test report and other pages, seem inconsistent
<Yves> Yves is rebuilding the report
draws the WG's attention to: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soapjms.html
<Yves> => reports done
looking at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/report/all.html
GlobalElementComplexType is a new pattern added by George
scribe: doesn't introduce any new
schema elements, but has been flagged as "Advanced"
... which flagging all examples as "Advanced"
This pattern should be "Basic"!
suddenly happy!
I don't think there is an issue, this is in *all* of our WSDL examples echoAttributeTypeReference etc introduced by test framework, therefore "Baisc"
suggest we meet same time next week
pauld: pick up a week today!
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: pauld Inferring Scribes: pauld WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found. Default Present: +0791888aaaa, pauld, Yves, Jonc, gcowe Present: +0791888aaaa pauld Yves Jonc gcowe WARNING: No meeting chair found! You should specify the meeting chair like this: <dbooth> Chair: dbooth Found Date: 15 Jul 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/15-databinding-minutes.html People with action items: WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found! Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>. Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of new discussion topics or agenda items, such as: <dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]