See also: IRC log
<Roland> 06zakim, who is on the phone?01
<Roland> 06Zakim, who is on the phone?01
<Roland> 06Scribe: markPhillips
roland: A couple of updates to make
1. The namespace needs to be updated
philippe: Recommend using ns namespace so that dates do not need to be updated
<Roland> 06www.w3c.org/ns/soap-jms ?
The undated namespace would be the final namespace (for use at the CR stage). In the interim we should use a dated namespace for each draft of the spec.
RESOLUTION: First working draft will use the year and month namespace (e.g. "http://www.w3.org/2008/06/soap/bindings/JMS/"). The final recommendation will be undated ( "http://www.w3.org/ns/soap/bindings/JMS/")
roland: How should we construct a test plan?
plh: No best practices per se. For WSDL 2 an interchange format was used to capture the WSDL component model and testing was performed by comparing the interchange formats created by different implementations
For wire formats they defined a canonical representation of SOAP messages described by WSDL then compared to the wire format messages generated by different implementations
PhilAdams: Do we need to specify the API calls used to construct messages? If so we need to document them in the spec.
alewis: The spec implies the calls which are necessary. The only thing we have in common is the API.
PhilAdams: The test suite could act as the receiver (or producer) for messages and validate them
alewis: The advantage of the WSDL model is that a declarative and correct representation of messages can be produced and validated in isolation
roland: could we write up the different proposals for discussion
<scribe> ACTION: PhilAdams to write up a test proposal due next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Sorry, couldn't find user - PhilAdams
<plh> trackbot-ng, status
<scribe> ACTION: Amelia to write up a test proposal due next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-6 - Write up a test proposal due next week [on Amelia Lewis - due 2008-06-03].
<plh> ACTION: Phil to write up a test proposal due next week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-7 - Write up a test proposal due next week [on Phil Adams - due 2008-06-03].
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.133 of Date: 2008/01/18 18:48:51 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) No ScribeNick specified. Guessing ScribeNick: markphillips Inferring Scribes: markphillips Default Present: alewis, Roland, Phil, Peter, Plh, Derek, +0196270aaaa, MarkPhillips, Bhakti Present: alewis Roland Phil Peter Plh Derek +0196270aaaa MarkPhillips Bhakti Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-soap-jms/2008May/0042.html Got date from IRC log name: 27 May 2008 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2008/05/27-soap-jms-minutes.html People with action items: amelia phil philadams WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines. You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]