XML Security Specifications Maintenance Working Group Teleconference

administrivia

fjh: two status questions: chartering, test suites

<fjh> tlr: W3C document license for test suites

<fjh> tlr: does not allow derivative works, but can distribute without modification

<fjh> tlr: do we need apache license?

http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/copyright-documents-20021231

<fjh> sean: can you please share link for W3C document license

<fjh> ACTION: sean to look at W3C document license compatibility with sharing test cases with Apache [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-145 - Look at W3C document license compatibility with sharing test cases with Apache [on Sean Mullan - due 2008-02-19].

minutes approval

minutes from last meeting: http://www.w3.org/2008/02/05-xmlsec-minutes

<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Feb/0013.htm

RESOLUTION: approved

xml sig 2nd ed

fjh: no major comments, Thomas added links from N/A for IBM to explanation
... would like to move forward into process ...
... step for wg is to seek transition to PER ...
... then transition meeting with director, AC, then transition to REC ...
... would like to get it started now ...

PROPOSED: To seek transition of XML Signature to PER.

<brich> +1

RESOLUTION: To seek transition of XML Signature draft to PER.

Test case document as note

<PHB> [going off irc for a minute]

fjh: Sean, you did some work on it
... might need some status updates ...

sean: haven't checked in
... fixed some things ...
... document contains relative URI references ...
... document needs context ...

tlr: umh. Either way should work.

sean: would rather not spend time changing it.
... fjh, what do you mean by "references need adjustment" ...

fjh: something looked wrong in my browser
... will check again ...

sean: shortname?

fjh: thomas had a proposal

xmldsig-tests, xmldsig2ed-tests

<fjh> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2008Feb/0009.html

ed: would like it to be xmlsig not xmldsig for future version

tlr: that's a different discussion

fjh: xmldsig sounds good

PROPOSED: xmldsig-tests

fjh: let's not get it confused with 1st ed

xmldsig2nded-tests

xmldsiged2-tests

<fjh> PROPOSED: xmldsig2ed-tests

fjh: ed, opinions?

ed: not opinionated

+1 to xmldsig2ed-tests

<brich> +1

<EdS> +1

RESOLUTION: to publish test suite document as Note, shortname xmldsig2ed-tests

<fjh> ACTION: frederick to review test case references formatting issue [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/02/12-xmlsec-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-146 - Review test case references formatting issue [on Frederick Hirsch - due 2008-02-19].

sean: need to do a few changes still

fjh: maybe check in now?

tlr: +1

sean: will take look after the meeting, check in then

<fjh> sean: will scribe next week

EXI

<fjh> scribenick: fjh

defer until next time when Juan Carlos on call

Best Practices

starting soon

<tlr> ScribeNick: tlr

fjh: adjourned

rragent, draft minutes