See also: IRC log
Jo: was not able to have call
last week
... so no further progress in last week
... will be sending out noted about Bryan's proposed text
... if no objections this will be the draft
... Francois has volunteered to lead the CT Task Force. Thanks
very much.
Francois: CT guidleline needs to move forward and I will try to make progress
Jo: Thanks very much for "volunteering"
Sean: Trying to get to a point
where we can cut a new release of the checker, as a Beta
... still some issues to fix
... issues are bing fixed. Will discuss on list whether it is
ready for a beta release
... may take another week or so
... would keep the beta in public for about 2 months then
release as 1.0
Jo: Thanks for all the hard work
<dom> +1 to jo's position
Jo: would prefer to delay a little more and ensure that the beta is at least complete
dom: agree with fixing all discrepancies from MobileOK before beta
Jo: There is a question as to whether the existing check should be replaced anyway since the checker is already better
dom: There is a resource issue with doing this
Jo: Regrets from Phil
... next call will be one week from today at 1pm
... UTC
<francois> Relationship Between Mobile Web Best Practices 1.0 and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
achuter: Has been a lot work to
get public working draft..
... Francois has helped a lot.. It is now ready to go. People
should have looked at it by now.
<dom> PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Request Current Draft transition to First Public Working Draft
Jo: We should all be very excited by this. We are putting into the public domain in a somewhat incomplete state to get early comment
Francos: Wording in TOC is slightly different from other document (see WCAG link)
<dom> Congrats to Alan!
Jo: any further comment?
<dom> RESOLUTION: Request Current Draft transition to First Public Working Draft
<Zakim> dom, you wanted to talk about for pub date, shortname
Jo: Thanks to our beloved staff contacts for their cooperation and collaboration. We will request the transition
<dom> RESOLUTION: doc to be published as mwbp-wcag on Jan 22
Dom: [discussion of short name and date]
Jo: We should think about working with EOWG to promote this document
<dom> "Please send feedback to both wai-eo-editors@w3.org (archive) and public-bpwg@w3.org (archive)."
Alan: We don't have a forum for the discussion at the moment
Jo: Looking for a recommendation of what we should do for this
Dom: Suggest bpwg-comments
Jo: we would prefer all comments to be on one list so they should not go onto two lists
<dom> (I meant "public-bpwg-comments@w3.org")
<dom> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-bpwg-comments/
<dom> ACTION: ALan to update the comments list to public-bpwg-comments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - ALan
<trackbot-ng> Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. achuter, atai)
<dom> ACTION: achuter to update the comments list to public-bpwg-comments [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-619 - Update the comments list to public-bpwg-comments [on Alan Chuter - due 2008-01-24].
Jo: we thank the Team in advance for their work on this
Bryan: current status: Sent out email requesting input
<dom> ACTION-592?
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-592 -- Edward Mitukiewicz to report whether he can be editor of the document who shall not be named -- due 2008-01-03 -- OPEN
<trackbot-ng> http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/BPWG/Group/track/actions/592
Bryan: this is the only progress in the last week.
<dom> close ACTION-592
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-592 report whether he can be editor of the document who shall not be named closed
Jo: Ed regrets that he cannot
assume co-editorship
... Open question is can anyone else assume that role?
... there are many benefits.
... [discussion of XML/HTML editors for preparing spec
documents]
<dom> (as a reminder, http://www.w3.org/2003/Editors/ has many information for editors, and any addition to that page is also welcome)
<scribe> ACTION: Jo to raise issue of co-editorship vacancy [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-620 - Raise issue of co-editorship vacancy [on Jo Rabin - due 2008-01-24].
Bryan: received email from Phillip Hoschka re Mobile AJAX
Jo: take it up with Dan
Appelquist
... is a formal liaison needed?
<dom> ACTION: Dom to check if W3C has a liaison with OpenAjax [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2008/01/17-bpwg-minutes.html#action04]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-621 - Check if W3C has a liaison with OpenAjax [on Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux - due 2008-01-24].
Dom: there isn't one in place now
Jo: People starting to make
travel plans..
... BPWG meeting on Mon/Tue, overlap with UWA then DDWG on
Thu/Fri
... is that correct?
<dom> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-bpwg/2008Jan/0018.html
Jo: We need to communicate this with members of the group. Should have a further survey.
Dom: At this stage we should open a registration form but we are waiting for all the logistical details from the hosts
Jo: So we will need to hold off
until we have accommodation info.
... We should send out a reminder announcing the registration
will be open shortly
... Quick straw poll..
<dom> [I won't be coming to Seoul unfortunately due to a conflicting commitment]
Jo: who is definitely not coming?
<achuter> +1
<srowen> (I cannot attend)
Jo: Who is definitely coming?
<francois> I'm coming
<Bryan> +1
<jo> +1
<Jason> I'm waiting for travel approval
<SeanP> I'm a hopeful
none
<achuter> bye
<Magnus> bye bye
<nacho> thanks, bye
<abel> bye
<jo> Thanks to Martin for Scribing
Thanks