Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.

F2F5 Agenda

From OWL
Jump to: navigation, search


See F2F5 and minutes Day 1 and Day 2

Day 1

  • 09:00 - 09:15 Welcome, local arrangements, introductions
  • 09:15 - 10:45 Admin (scribe: pfps)
    • Roll Call
    • Agenda amendments?
      • LC Comments 62 and 63??
    • Roadmap and schedule review
  • 10:45 - 11:15 Coffee
  • 11:15 - 13:00 LC Comments: Presentation (scribe: Mike Smith)
    • Introduction/Roadmap
      • Document introduction 10
      • Editorial-Guide to documents desired 42
      • Roadmap needed 49
    • Naming
      • inconsistent use of OWL/DL/Full 28
      • Naming issues 52b
      • Inconsistent use of OWL/DL/Full + more triple syntax needed 48
      • documents should show triple-serialisation - Response Drafted 29
  • 13:00 - 14:00 Lunch
  • 14:00 - 15:45 LC Comments: Datatypes (scribe: Michael Schneider)
    • OWL/RIF
      • non-disjointness of numeric datatypes 24
      • OWL/RIF datatypes 22
      • OWL/RIF datatypes 25
    • OWL RL
      • Supported RL datatypes 20
      • OWL RL Datatypes 43b
    • Other
      • named datatypes - Response drafted 51
      • datatype properties should be functional - Response sent 51
      • wants nary datatype predicates 46
  • 15:45 - 16:15 Coffee
  • 16:15 - 18:00 LC Comments: Profiles (scribe: Markus Krötzsch)
    • OWL RL
      • RL semantics 61
      • RL Theorem PR1 - Response drafted 15
    • OWL QL
      • Extending QL 18
      • Extending QL + complexity (editorial) 19
      • QL sameAs 59
    • General
      • IRI names for profiles (as annotations) - Response sent 31
  • 18:30 - 19:15 Drinks/Dinner

Day 2

  • 09:00 - 10:45 LC Comments: Technical (scribe: Jie Bao)
    • TQ 34b
    • Imports
      • definition(s) of imports closure - Response drafted, under debate 53
      • Imports by location 7 Draft response TR1
    • Axioms
      • axiom hiding 39
      • axiom naming via canonical annotation 41
    • Other
      • object to new treatment of anonymous individuals - Response drafted 30
      • strong typing 58
      • redesign XML syntax 40
      • keys should be 1:1 (i.e., multiple key values not allowed) 47
      • automated testing + OWLlink interface - Response drafted 45
      • extended annotations to support sanctioning 23
      • GRDDL 17, 10
  • 10:45 - 11:15 Coffee
  • 11:15 - 11:45 LC Comments: Editorial & Philosophical (scribe: Boris Motik)
    • Philosophical
      • OWL diverging from RDF 56 Response drafted
      • disruption of SW stack 54 Response already sent
      • Hostility to XML 29 Two Responses Drafted
      • Cost of OWL2 is too high 34a
      • doubts about need for OWL2 27
      • Industry not interested; hard to use; hard to select profiles 26a Response already sent
      • Supporting 26a 37 Response already sent
    • Editorial
      • 8 Facet space
      • 9 Examples for global restrictions
      • 14 Entailment question Response drafted
      • 16 Lexical form/value Response drafted
      • 21 Various
      • 26b Editorial comments + general praise?! Response already sent
      • 32 Documentation of OWL2-RL Response drafted
      • 33 SSFSS Editorial comments
      • 44 Structures, elements of the structural specification, and equivalence
      • 50 Sameness and Namedness Raiser ACK - OK
      • 52a RDF Semantics editorials 'Not LC comment
      • 55 octets vs. characters Raiser ACK - OK
      • 38 syntax editorial Response drafted
      • 43a Editorial comments from Oracle One Response already sent, Other drafted
      • 60 Syntactic conformance
      • 51 Racer editorial Response drafted
  • 13:00 - 14:00 Lunch
  • 14:00 - 15:45 Remaining Issues & Other Documents (scribe: ???)
  • 15:45 - 16:15 Coffee
  • 16:15 - 18:00 Test Cases and Discussion (scribe: Zhe Wu)
    • Test Cases
      • Problems (if any)
      • Progress on tool support, e.g., for "species validation"
      • Other issues?
    • Recap and further discussion of choices we need to make, actions, and schedule
    • AOB