Member-confidential full minutes
See also: IRC log
Next meeting: 11 December
tlr: Any reviewers for access-control document from WAF?
hal: don't think problem /
requirements statement is clear. Planning to work on that
aspect.
... might involve general review ...
tlr: ok, that can probably be tracked in at least 2 WGs.
http://www.w3.org/2007/11/27-xmlsec-minutes.html
RESOLUTION: minutes approved
tlr: please review latest draft-eastlake
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec-maintwg/2007Nov/0013.html
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/c14n11/07-12-03-redline/
tlr: revert xml:id related change
sean: checked in document, fyi
tlr: sean, please introduce xml:id related change
sean: at face-to-face, decided
that test cases / examples in c14n 1.1 should use xml:id
... agreed to test that ...
... took some weeks to go around to that ...
... discovered that there's xpath expression that depends on
id() function ...
... unfortunately, xpath 1.0 does not support xml:id ...
... those examples don't work with xpath 1.0 ...
... don't work with majority of existing software ...
<brich> +1, i'm ok with this
sean: propose reverting to
existing examples, to avoid any troubles ...
... existing interop tests don't need to be changed; they used
the older version of example
<pdatta> i'm also ok with this
sean: no need to regenerate anything ...
RESOLUTION: WG agrees to revert to old set of examples
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html#XMLID
http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html#XMLBASE_C14N11SPEC
sean: Those test actually existed.
<sean> http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/interop/xmlsig-interop-doc/testcases.html#XMLBASE_C14N11SPEC
Test case c14n11/xmlbase-c14n11spec-103
sean: at face-to-face, added test
case for the example that is in the c14n 1.1
specification
... for xml:base propagation ...
... we actually added two ...
... one was slightly different ...
... never updated interop document ...
... added 3.2.4.2
... same format as the rest ...
... documents test case ...
... added third one, based on example that we discussed at f2f
...
... with xml:base fix-up ...
... illustrating illustration to remove_dot_segments algorithm
...
... three new test cases ...
... believe all these should be required ...
tlr: review, running of these test cases?
pratik: not yet
brich: reviewed raw XML last
night
... not yet a chance to run them ...
tlr: let's check in on that next
week
... what was test case naming change about, again?
sean: I raised that. The naming was ...
brich: ... ad-hoc ...
sean: proposed more consistent
naming
... will go ahead and rename all test vectors to these names,
unless there are objections ...
... mostly want to hear from bruce and pratik ...
... konrad ain't here, don't expect trouble from him ...
bruce: ok
pratik: can rename them
<scribe> ACTION: sean to rename test cases as proposed [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/12/04-xmlsec-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot-ng> Created ACTION-120 - Rename test cases as proposed [on Sean Mullan - due 2007-12-11].
Participants discussed product plans and the current state of running certain elements of the test suite. The full discussion is minuted in the full minutes (member-confidential).
tlr: will prepare template this week
http://www.w3.org/Signature/2000/10/10-c14n-interop.html
... to serve as starting point ...
<klanz2> we usually run most of them as regression tests
tlr: where are we on legacy test cases?
sean: run them as functional
test
... not enhancing them ...
<klanz2> there should be a link in the test cases document
pratik: ran these a long time
ago
... part of regressions ...
<sean> http://www.w3.org/Signature/2001/04/05-xmldsig-interop.html
brich: can check with dev team
...
... have test bucket, not sure how that maps to these things
...
ACTION-119?
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-119 -- Thomas Roessler to work with comm team on AC advance notice -- due 2007-12-04 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot-ng> http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/119
ACTION-119 closed
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-119 Work with comm team on AC advance notice closed
ACTION-118?
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-118 -- Thomas Roessler to send message to public-xmlsec-discuss to solicit feed-back -- due 2007-12-04 -- PENDINGREVIEW
<trackbot-ng> http://www.w3.org/2007/xmlsec/Group/track/actions/118
ACTION-118 closed
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-118 Send message to public-xmlsec-discuss to solicit feed-back closed
tlr: believe there's some input from RSA coming in; let's look at that next time
tlr: anything?
-- silence ---
ACTION-102 closed
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-102 Write up choice re 4.3.3.1 closed
ACTION-104 closed
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-104 Contact Martin D, get handle on HRRI / IRI / charmod issues closed
ACTION-109 closed
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-109 Provide example for "isolated .." case closed
ACTION-113 closed
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-113 Update testcase document closed
ACTION-114 closed
<trackbot-ng> ACTION-114 Ensure that result from ACTION-109 goes into test suite closed
sean: regrets for 11 December