Mobile Web Test Suites Working Group teleconf

30 Oct 2007


See also: IRC log


Carmelo, Jenise, Wilhelm, Dom, dmitri




OMA liaison work items

Dmitri: I've looked a bit in the SVG Tiny 1.2 test suite
... and looked at the OMA ETR document
... I have drafted a message for the SVG Working Group
... on which Dom commented
... I'll update the message and send it to the SVG group in a couple of hours
... as far as I understand, our future work depends on the current state of coverage report from the SVG Working Group
... if they have a complete coverage report or a complete set of test assertions, we can understand what features requirement from the OMA group has been tested
... if they don't (or only a high level report), we'll probably need to do the coverage analysis ourselves
... in which case, we'll need quite a bit of resources to do this
... I have a question, though: is the coverage report a requirement for test suites for working groups?

Dom: no, it isn't unfortunately
... I doubt the SVG group will have a detailed report
... W3C groups rarely have enough resources for this

Dmitri: in this case, what should we do? doing a full coverage report will require a lot of resources

Dom: one solution would be to look at the SVG Tiny test suite, where I think the test cases names give a rough indication of what features are tested
... and compare that list of features to what the OMA would need

Dmitri: the OMA divided their test requirements by features too, so it may help us do the job

<scribe> ACTION: Dmitri to do a high-level coverage analysis of the SVG Tiny 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-mwts-minutes.html#action01]

Dom: good work!

Dmitri: I'll send the message to SVG WG after this meeting

Carmelo: I contacted the the CSS Working Group about CSS MP 2.0 test suite
... I'll come up with a plan to fill the gaps between the WCSS and CSS MP, that I can present during the F2F

Dom: re XHTML MP test suite, I sent a first corrected part of the test suite, based on the bug report I sent a few weeks ago to the oMA
... hopefully they can integrate it in their test suite without too much legal troubles

NIST contributions

-> http://www.w3.org/2007/10/mwts-nist/ NIST test cases contributions

Carmelo: this is based on the XHTML MP test suite, to complete some holes in the forms module
... it isn't full coverage of the module, but it's already an improvement
... please have a look at it, and send us feedback (or we can look at that during the F2F)

Dom: thanks for the contributions!
... I'll send feedback, have already a few comments to make

mobile ACID test:

-> http://www.jwtmp.com/a/ mobile ACID test

dom: [introduces the concept of ACID2 test as emulation, and how it applies to mobile]

Wilhem: concepts sounds great; the implementation needs some refinements
... will send details by email

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Dmitri to do a high-level coverage analysis of the SVG Tiny 1.2 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/10/30-mwts-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.128 (CVS log)
$Date: 2007/10/30 15:28:50 $