See also: IRC log
seems to complement nicely the coverage stuff i'm (working on|banging my head against)
<LeeF> SteveH - thanks for the info re: type promotion - I don't think we approved those yet
<SteveH> ok, great
<LeeF> Scribe: ??
<SteveH> LeeF, is this likely to be a long one?
<LeeF> ...esp. distinct + type promotion
<LeeF> I don't see a lot of working group (as opposed to individual) work on the agenda
<LeeF> Scribe: ericP
<scribe> Scribenick: ericP
next meeting: 24 July, scribe: AndyS
<LeeF> minutes from last week
<LeeF> approved
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to run the construct tests by 17 Ju [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action01]
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to mark approved sorting tests (1..10) as such [DONE] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action02]
action -1
action -2
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to generate overview page of data-r2 tests [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action03]
<LeeF> ACTION: EricP to run the yacker tool over and annotate the existing tests to summarize coverage [PENDING] but progress [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action04]
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to put up a document with sample EARL results and call out important points (e.g. foaf:homepage URI and/or URIs for implementations (object of earl:subject)? [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action05]
<LeeF> ACTION: AndyS or LeeF to mark non-SELECT tests using :QueryForm classes, and to move those URIs to the qt: namespace [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action06]
<LeeF> ACTION: EliasT to come up with feature list for protocol testing [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action07]
<LeeF> ACTION: Eric+Andy: Collect all the testing feature URIs and put in the documentation [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action08]
<LeeF> ACTION: ericP & chimezie to see if all the identified algebraic forms fit into the XPath-based facet approach [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action09]
<LeeF> action -8
<LeeF> ACTION: Eric+Andy to identify and collect mf:requires URIs and put in documentation [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action10]
<LeeF> ACTION: ericP to write a test showing that langMatches doens't do extended matching [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action11]
<AndyS> DE-*
de-de
<LeeF> AndyS, ericP: discussion of what goes into the non-extended-langmatches testing
<LeeF> ACTION: ericP to write explanatory text saying that, like xsd:inteter and xsd:dateTime, the relative order of simple literals and xsd:strings is not defined here [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action12]
<LeeF> ACTION: ericP, AndyS to add the mf:requires labels to the manifest namespace document [CONTINUES] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action13]
<LeeF> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/type-promotion/manifest.ttl
<LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve the type promotion tests in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/type-promotion/manifest.ttl
<LeeF> approved
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to mark type promotion tests approved http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/type-promotion/manifest.ttl [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action14]
<LeeF> glitter passes 10 out of 10 distinct tests
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/distinct/manifest.ttl
<LeeF> PROPOSED: Approve the 10 tests in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/distinct/manifest.ttl
<LeeF> approved
<LeeF> ACTION: LeeF to mark 10 distinct tests in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data-r2/distinct/manifest.ttl as approved [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action15]
<AndyS> ==> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/
<LeeF> ericP will ask about having a short document at /TR/sparql with pointers to QL, protocol, results, and JSON?
<LeeF> precedent: was done for SOAP
<LeeF> ACTION: ericP to requisition /TR/SPARQL as a switcher document pointing to the real specs [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html#action16]
<LeeF> things happening: ericP working on coverage, lee working on test overview, EARL summary, note to implementors
<LeeF> also possibly ivan and orri working on service for testing public SPARQL endpoints
<LeeF> I see the protocol schedule as being somewhat at-risk given our charter end date of the end of November - still can be done, but a bit doubtful
AndyS: we lack SOAP impls
LeeF: we 1/2-wrote one at
IBM
... could take this to the CG
... difficult to put together impl criteria that doesn't
include the SOAP bindings
ericP: do impls need to do SOAP?
LeeF: iirc, they just need to do *a* binding
<LeeF> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-protocol/#conformance
<LeeF> adjourned
ericP: odd that you can impl a non-HTTP, non-SOAP binding and still claim to protoocl conformance
PROPOSED: oh well
APPROVED: no objections
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.128 of Date: 2007/02/23 21:38:13 Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Found Scribe: ?? Found Scribe: ericP Inferring ScribeNick: ericP Found ScribeNick: ericP Scribes: ??, ericP WARNING: No "Present: ... " found! Possibly Present: APPROVED AndyS LeeF P0 P4 PROPOSED Scribenick Souri Souri2 Souri_Das SteveH ericP inserted iv_an_ru precedent You can indicate people for the Present list like this: <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary <dbooth> Present+ amy Regrets: chimezie Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0013.html Got date from IRC log name: 17 Jul 2007 Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/07/17-dawg-minutes.html People with action items: andy andys chimezie eliast eric ericp leef or[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]