ERT WG -- 20 Jun 2007

saz: thanks for input

saz: few are still open

ci: we need this clarification, maybe raise this issue again

RESOLUTION: send issue on resolution of comment #2 to BPWG

saz: comment #3 by chaals
... do we agree with this concern

jk: I do

ci: it's enough to have it in the reference implementation
... no problem with raising the issue again

RESOLUTION: send issue on resolution of comment #3 to BPWG

saz: comment #4

ci: 300 is not always shown to the user, may depend on configuration

saz: we could rephrase chaal's concern into a question
... if 300 _is_ shown to the user then it should be checked

RESOLUTION: rephrase objection to #4 into question and send back to BPWG

ci: I don't understand the response

jk: I don't see a connection to the BP document

<CarlosI> extract: "Devices may realize the intentions of authors more accurately if margins, borders and padding are specified in pixels"

RESOLUTION: we ACK ambiguity in the BP doc, but we want this issue to be clarified.

saz: #12

RESOLUTION: send BPWG that external CSS was not addressed

saz: #13

RESOLUTION: send back #13 to BPWG

<scribe> ACTION: jk to read ci's and rr's comments on current mobileOK basic draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-er-minutes.html#action01]

<scribe> ACTION: ci to read jk's and rr's comments on current mobileOK basic draft [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-er-minutes.html#action02]

<scribe> ACTION: everyone read all comments on current mobileOK basic draft and send objections by end of thursday [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/06/20-er-minutes.html#action03]

ERT WG