See also: IRC log
<Dunitschka> update on community projects: nothing new
<kidehen> Kingsley's update re. Information Gathering
<kidehen> Input form effort is outstanding due to some information infrastructure issues (following power failure over the weekend in the area where we are situated: Burlington, MA). I should have a machine and DB combo setup for one of my admins to pickup with Ivan
<kidehen> Re. Community Projects: CIA Factbook and Musicbrainz have been added to the ever growing collection of Openly accessible and URI dereferencable RDF Data Sets
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/Semantic_Web_Flyer
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/first_drafts
Dunja explains the green version of the first version
Dunja explains now the idea of the second version, the pink one
Ivan: the colour of the pink version is a bit too strong
Susie: +1 to Ivan's comment
... share the link by email
... group to provide comments on these versions
<bengee> ...or to make it available in a public area?
Ivan: W3C's opinion would be good
<bengee> (as /me still can't access the private wiki space)
Ivan: I like the green version
... usage of fonts should be make clear...our house fonts would be probably
better
<_uldis> the DNA structure on the pink is nice though.
<_uldis> can we try a DNA version for different colors and see how they look?
<Karen> In print materials, we recommend Gill Sans and Gill Sans Bold from Adobe Systems. Walbaum may be used for a second font. Times Roman may be substituted for Walbaum.
thanks, Karen for the information
<Karen> You're welcome; from the CommTeam guidelines
Group: Semantic Web not particular to life sciences...
Dunja: another draft of the pink version...DNA structure not prioritized
<kjetilk> +1 for that
Ivan: not bound to a specific area
Karen: offers a couple of suggestions
... importance of data intergration for example
... high-level brochure taking this in consideration
Susie: pink version less pink and more general would be good
Ivan: I like the green colour better
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/sweo/group/wiki/Semantic_Web_Flyer
<Dunitschka> Paula: deleted bulidingblocks, Susie added something on W3C
<Dunitschka> Ivan: enough space on the flyer?
<Dunitschka> Susie: descriptions on W3C, SWEO can be shorter
<Dunitschka> Ivan: is it worth having an item on SWEO at all?
<Dunitschka> Ivan/Susie: delete the SWEO part
<Dunitschka> Paula: img on data integration
<Dunitschka> Ivan: the eye is too prominent
<Dunitschka> Paula: draft for giving a guideline for a professional version
<Dunitschka> Ivan: very soon 11-12 use cases - can be published
<Dunitschka> Susie: maybe a yahoo use case
<Dunitschka> Susie will be at the ESTC (31 May-1 June)
<Dunitschka> Susie: Lilly use case in June
<Dunitschka> Karen: OMG is putting up a new website with a lot of ressources
<Dunitschka> Susie: GRDDL group is developing logos
<Dunitschka> Ivan: its only a grddl logo; idea was to adapt that for a SW logo
<Susie> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-grddl-wg/2007May/0043.html
<Dunitschka> Ivan: Benjamin to get in contact with grddl group to share logo ideas
but I think they go for blue,not black
<bengee> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/Logos/SemWebLogoIdeas
<Dunitschka> Benjamin: please give comments on the proposals
<Dunitschka> Ivan: very abstract - difficulties to see the SW
<Dunitschka> +1
<Karen> Let me share with CommTeam first
<Dunitschka> enterprise survey progress
<Dunitschka> Karen: more next week