See also: IRC log
SAZ: CI, any news about it?
CI: work in progress
... hopefully something avalaible for the next week
SAZ: CV, news about Guide?
CV: quite busy with BenToWeb
... some issues raised with the content class
hopefully an updated version for the 11th
SAZ: issue from TSD TF about test cases
metadata expressed as XML instead of RDF
... the need of a TCDL is something this WG has discussed before
... CV, could this be something you can participate after EARL (and probably
BTW) work?
CV: not clear know
CI: it's something we already need but must
come after EARL
... not sure about CTIC interest
SAZ: at this stage there is no critical mass
SAZ: not been here next week and maybe the need
after
... would like to have meeting for the rest of the group anyway with JK as
temporal chair
no objections
<scribe> ACTION: CV to send new comments about EARL schema [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/05/02-er-minutes.html#action01]
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues
SAZ: several are just editorial
... let's have a light walk through
quick review discussion...
<shadi> RESOLUTION: mark the following issues as editorial: 1-3; 5-6; 15-18; 24-28;
SAZ: the way we're using OWL (mixing RDF and
OWL) is not valid
... two options OWL or RDF
... RDF seems more sensible know
... min cardinalities are restrictions but not rules restrictions (the use we
do know), they are more ontological restrictions
... any further comment should be send to the list ASAP
JK: if we decide to create an XML schema, are still consuming tools required to be able to understand RDF?
SAZ: know we are asuming RDF is the only
normative representation
... EARL is a simple vocabulary and it may have a one to one mapping with
XML
JK: it's not one to one
SAZ: would like to see pros and cons
... something to discuss on the mailing list
SAZ: JK, something to remark?
JK: comments about inconsistence of the
schema
... there are no predefined response codes for extensions
... why don't have literal values for some properties
SAZ: HTTP in RDF is not in the REC track
... something to discuss