See also: IRC log
saz: we have to get back to work after some
weeks without regular meetings
... process document requires us to record any reaction on issues/comments
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/EARL10/issues
ACTION saz to update issues list for EARL 10 schema document
<scribe> ACTION: saz to update issues list for EARL 10 schema document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/18-er-minutes.html#action01]
<scribe> ACTION: jk to update issues list for HTTP-in-RDF document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/18-er-minutes.html#action02]
saz: pointer document
... no reaction by jim about our comments to the initial document from Gijon
F2F
... CarlosI, would you take over the editing of the pointers document?
ci: yep
<scribe> ACTION: ci to create a plan (summary) for a first public draft for the pointers document [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/18-er-minutes.html#action03]
saz: including estimation about timeline
... EARL guide ...
... we need a first public draft at least when pushing EARL schema to CR
saz: active WG member are usually listed as contributors
... but in current schema doc there are quite a lot of people that have not
been involved in the editing of the current document
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/2000/09/dbwg/details?group=32094
saz: propose to list only current active
members (in good standing)
... new members are added to the list
ci: what about lazy members initially listed as good standing?
saz: we need to synchronize good/bad standing status before we publish documents
ci: what about contributions/significant comments by people outside this group?
saz: significance has to be defined
jk: there were some significant changes after recieiving comments, we should mention these people
ci: have two separate lists: group members, external contributors
saz: could be difficult to explain why one contribution was more meaningful than the other
<CarlosI> [http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-mobileOK-basic10-tests-20061219/]
RESOLUTION: synchronize good/bad
standing status before publication of documents
... list all participants in good standing as contributors for a
publication
... lead editors of documents to track external contributions
... WG decision is needed for listing external contributors in specific
documents
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Apr/0006
saz: no comments or objections to this list?
<scribe> ACTION: saz to send these comments to ATAG WG [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/18-er-minutes.html#action04]
ci: we had a comment about our definition of test modes is not very clear
saz: I reword comment #3
<scribe> ACTION: saz to reword comment #3 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/04/18-er-minutes.html#action05]
saz: info by PF WG about ARIA for testing web
applications
... growing importance of testing (dynamic) DOM structure instead of static
source code
ci: Shadi, can you keep us up to date about this?
saz: yep
... we may want to think about recording the DOM structure
saz: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2007Mar/0108>
... we currently use OWL as a constraint language which seems to be not
optimal
... no meeting next week, but on May 2nd
... so have discussions on the mailing list