W3C

TSD TF

20 Feb 2007

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Michael, Shadi, CarlosV, Christophe, Daniela
Regrets
CarlosI, Vangelis
Chair
CarlosV, Christophe
Scribe
Daniela, Shadi

Contents


TSD TF Wiki

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/FrontPage

<shadi> http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleStatusList

CS: we have to decide whether we want a separate page per review (proposal of Vangelis) or one page per test case (proposal of Christophe)
... regarding the index page, we could have "one big table" or "one page per SC"

SAZ: let's keep it simple: start with big status list (index page=one big table) - see in a couple of weeks if we have to separate it (if it gets too big)
... maybe there will be some tool support in near time
... maybe we can review the tool in development in the frame of this task force / the telecons
... ID does reflect success criteria, so we could sort the entries in the table according to this.

RESOLUTION: Status list is one big table with test samples sorted by ID

<Christophe> http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleOverviewTemplate

CS: Templates for reviews can't be finished before review process is fixed

SAZ: if you select field "Review" in the status list, you get to "Overview Template"?
... there might be several rounds of content and structure reviews - so ONE file for all could get too big
... propose a table with review history which links to all reviews done...

CV: prefer one page for content review, one page for structure review

SAZ: when / how often do we need to see the complete history of test sample?

CS: every time you do a review and want to know what happened before

* sorry, I have been kicked out of the line and I am not able to dial in again...

<shadi> scribe: Shadi

[discussion about which coloumns to have in the status list table]

cv: if the target audience is TF then would be good to know the reviewers

PROPOSAL: ID, Structure Review, Contenr Review, Status, Submitter

<CarlosV> PROPOSAL: ID, Structure Review (Reviewer), Contenr Review (Reviewer), Status, Submitter

<a href="link_to_review">??? (ReviewerName)</a>

<a href="link_to_review">link_to_review</a> (ReviewerName), ...

<CarlosV> <a href="link_to_review">link_to_review</a> (<a href="link_to_reviewer">ReviewerName</a>)

RESOLUTION: agreement to list reviewer names beside the link to the review page
... drop overview page in favor of status list pointing directly to the reviews

s/overview page/overview page (http://www.w3.org/2006/tsdtf/TestSampleOverviewTemplate)

<scribe> ACTION: CS to add example entries based on currently available test samples and reviews (despite the reviews being on the list) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01]

<CarlosV> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/

saz: we will need directions on how to create pages based on the template at some point

http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/

http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: CS to add example entries based on currently available test samples and reviews (despite the reviews being on the list) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/20-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log)
$Date: 2007/02/20 15:08:34 $