See also: IRC log
scribe: pinging the DE/AT W3C office, no reply yet
<ivan> ACTION: Susie to ping the w3c de/at office again [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action01]
scribe: re brochures for www2007
<Dunitschka> yea i did
scribe: jeff
<leobard> bengee: Alistair Duke had an action item to sum up his use case
scribe: alistair making progress on his use ase
action item
... several case study contacts are being worked on (nokia?, ontotext, ..)
nxt: kjetil on community projects
<kjetilk> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/LinkingOpenData
nxt: linked data got lots of cimmitments
commitments even
<kjetilk> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/FOAFWhitelisting
foaf whitelisting as well
<kjetilk> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/MediaWidgets
scribe: a new one: media widgets
<kjetilk> http://esw.w3.org/topic/SweoIG/TaskForces/CommunityProjects/HistoryBookForTomorrow
the 4 projects just pasted by kjetilk have commitments
<leobard> question asked: what should we do now given the projects at hand?
ivan: asks for kjetil's next step plans
<leobard> kjetilk: the data projects are promising
kjetilk: try to make projects proceed somehow, maybe give some exposure already
susie: maybe the rest of the group could have a look at the list and collect some comments wrt chance to being successful etc
<leobard> susie: next week we can select which project we support
ivan: linked data seems to have the largest impact, but may not really match the idea of convincing outsiders, as its more data oriented, not really app-focused
<leobard> ivan: the "linking open data" project's value is only for semantic web geeks.
<LeeF> +1 to ivan's take on the projects
ivan: on the other hand: an excellent project that may be a prerequisite for other ones
<leobard> ivan: we want to have several projects we give publicity
<leobard> ivan: not only one or two projects
<wing> nice, kjetilk
kjetilk: agrees with ivan that his project is,
without being biased, is more useful for the showing side
... ;)
susie: there will probably a list of several projects (not just one)
*be* a list of
<kjetilk> +1
scribe: adds a personal suggestion wrt to the
community projects
... that the group creates some sort of voting
... maybe anonymously
<kjetilk> +1 for trusting Susie
susie: maybe just send it to her and she will
put it in a spreadsheet
... general agreement
PaulaP: whether voting is one-per-person only
susie: any input should be welcome
leobard: not much progress on infogathering,
but looks pretty done for the first step
... will update the wiki pages and pings the list for a review
<Zakim> kjetilk, you wanted to say that I might not be here next week
Ivan and Kjetilk will probably not be available next week
Karen ad wing on enterprise survey, candidates for use cases
scribe: not much news, but positive feedback from within w3c so far
(if I got that right)
susie pinged several companies (pfizer?, agfa, ) for use case (or case studies?) examples
agfa's jos de roo has already written some things
<leobard> susie: we received a use case description, but it was too scientific
scribe: could use that as a starting point
... not response from DigitalHarbour yet
... ora lassila responded for nokia
... there is a project within nokia, but he'll have to forward the request
... BT
... EPA
... work that could be useful, would be interested
... in general: pretty positive feedback
scribe: wants to make sure that the ourput is going to be tailored to groups like CIOs, CTOs, etc
<LeeF> Joost
Ivan suggests to add joost to the list
<PaulW> http://www.joost.com/
<kjetilk> http://opensource.joost.com/libb/
<kjetilk> libby miller
<uldis_> danbri is also working with asemantics
<scribe> ACTION: bengee to find right person within joost to contact for use case / case study [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/14-SWEO-minutes.html#action02]
<kjetilk> http://www.leosimons.com/2006/rdf-at-the-venice-project.html
kjetilk: the practical problems they had could be interesting
yeah
susie: maybe dajobe from yahoo!
... swh from garlik
<leobard> susie: dajobe used rdf for the food website, thats a good use case
scribe: probably on the 23rd of april
... currently looking into accommodation etc
Leobard asks for use case format
Susie: rather high-level, maybe even
"glossy-style"
... about 2 pages in length
<wing> +1 to millions of dollars
Susie: "how the semweb made me rich"
<leobard> ontoware
Leobard: maybe contact even more companies (e.g. vendors)
scribe: probably on the 23rd of april
... currently looking into accommodation etc
next: AOB
... upcoming and past events
... interesting demos at cambridge meeting
... suggestion to move the call to some earlier time to better suit west
coast US, and Asia
... and GRDDLers
<leobard> I have something
Leobard: wonders if anything came out of dialog with semweb school AT already
Susie: still communicating
Proposal: move it one hour earlier
<kjetilk> +1
<ivan> +1
<PaulaP> +1
<Karen> +1
<PaulW> +1
+1 works for me
<wing> +1 , either way
<martind> +1
<PaulW> +2
<LeeF> 10am? so early!
<wing> sorry, LeeF
<leobard> I have a question about semantic-web.at ...
decision: to change the sweo call time to be one hour earlier