<Greg> Scribe = Greg

F2F Planning

<Greg> Tim Boland cannot accomodate the meeting venue

<Greg> Greg from Adobe will arrange for the meeting place for the Face to Face

<scribe> ACTION: GP to Arrange ATAG f2f mtg April 23-25. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-au-minutes.html#action01]

<Greg> Greg I will also put together info for travel and accomodations

<scribe> ACTION: GP to CORRECTION Arrange ATAG F2F mtg April 25-27 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-au-minutes.html#action02]

2. Action Item review:

http://www.w3.org/WAI/AU/2007/atag20_pubWD_7dec2006_comment_responses.html

JR: Numbered all, provided starter comments, and provided commenter name legend

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0016.html

<Greg> Link is to DRAFT Responses to Comments on

<Greg> ATAG 2.0 (7 December 2006) Public Draft:

Better URL:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0048.html

BF: MAybe use "along the way"...
... Prob people only would claim if there is a government legislation

<Greg> The notion of partial conformance is not an end in itself, but to be thought of as a milestone on the path to full conformance. The working group is seeking language to express that concept.

Relative Priority Review in response to concerns that relative priorities are overly confusing

<Greg> 1st scenario, keep all the same but rewrite for clarity

<Greg> 2nd scenario redefine priorities 1 for A, 2 for aa, 3 for AAA

<Greg> 3rd redefine the success criteria, but that could complicate matters

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0034.html

GP: Likes (2) so far

BF: No easy answer

<Greg> Jan points out that you can tie the information back to your benchmark document

<Greg> If you want to do Level 1 than in your benchmark documents you must do the following

<Greg> If you want to proceed to Level 2 then you must in addition do the following, etc...

<scribe> ACTION: JR to To flesh out a better proposal around option (2) of Relative Priority replacement message [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-au-minutes.html#action03]

Improving Benchmark document

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0019.html

<Greg> FAQ approach to clarify benchmark issues

<Greg> ACTION: all to Continue to take a look at the comments responses [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-au-minutes.html#action04]

<scribe> ACTION: all to Look at Idea that began with what to do with A.0.1 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0045.html) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-au-minutes.html#action05]

JR: Call ends at 4:55ET

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: JR
Inferring Scribes: JR
Default Present: JR, Greg_Pisocky, Barry
Present: JR Greg_Pisocky Barry
Regrets: Tim_Boland Roberto_Scano
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-au/2007JanMar/0050.html

WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 5 Feb 2007
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/02/05-au-minutes.html
People with action items: all gp jr

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.