W3C

- DRAFT -

WS-Addressing Teleconference
22 Jan 2007

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Regrets
Chair
Bob Freund
Scribe
yinleng

Contents


 

 

<bob> zalim, {IBM} is paco

<bob> scribe: yinleng

Agenda Review

Agenda accepted

Response to our review of WS-Policy

Dicussing comment we made to the attaching of policy to end point.

They closed it before reading our comments, without change.

<scribe> ACTION: Tom Rutt to provide rationale for closing [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-ws-addr-minutes.html#action01]

Bob: Folks please look at the options in Paul Cotton's email in the archives.

<anish> ACTION 1=

Review comments on Metadata document

Discussing Jonathan's comments

Discussing ignorable vs optional

Tom: Propose the example to take out optional

Tony: Agrees that the example should come out to agree with 3.9

Bob: Look at 3.8
... We need to fix one of the examples, 3.4
... if Tom wants to raise an issue, then we can go forward on that

Katy: issue on one of the examples too
... if we can have 3 examples - this is how we mandate WS-addressing, this is how we support WS-addressing, and a third on supporting WS-Policy.

Resolved to have 3 or 4 key examples

David: wants to tone down 3.1.4

Tony: likes 3.1.4 being in a separate section
... suggests changing "I support" to "I guarantee support"
... 3.3 is the most confusing
... Useful to put in a non-normative section discussing intersection algorithms, maybe?

Katy: need a use case, have it use case driven would help

<scribe> ACTION: Tony to explain the use of optional in 3.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-ws-addr-minutes.html#action02]

Tony: put notes under 3.1.2 and 3.1.4
... Can to changes to examples by doday

Tom: Put in a note on why we are doing optional?

Tony: will put it in an editiorial note
... will put it in 3.1.4

<scribe> ACTION: Tony will put in an editorial note explaining why in 3.1.4 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-ws-addr-minutes.html#action03]

meeting adjourned by 5.05 pm EST

<bob> rrsagentrrsagent, generate minutes

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: Tom Rutt to provide rationale for closing [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-ws-addr-minutes.html#action01]
[NEW] ACTION: Tony to explain the use of optional in 3.1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-ws-addr-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: Tony will put in an editorial note explaining why in 3.1.4 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-ws-addr-minutes.html#action03]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log)
$Date: 2007/01/22 22:08:18 $

Scribe.perl diagnostic output

[Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.]
This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/to/do/
Found Scribe: yinleng
Inferring ScribeNick: yinleng

WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: Anish_Karmarkar Dave_Hull David David_Illsley Gilbert_Pilz IBM Katy Marc_Hadley MrGoodner P13 Paco PaulKnight Paul_Knight TRutt_ Tom Tony TonyR anish bob dhull gpilz pauld
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2007Jan/0042.html
Got date from IRC log name: 22 Jan 2007
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2007/01/22-ws-addr-minutes.html
People with action items: rutt tom tony

WARNING: Input appears to use implicit continuation lines.
You may need the "-implicitContinuations" option.


[End of scribe.perl diagnostic output]