ISSUE-110 - Public View

Do we need a singular method for getting just one element

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Selectors API
Raised by:
Charles Mccathienevile
Opened on:
2007-01-28
Description:
How valuable is this? If we didn't have it, we could have 
getElementsBySelector() and no singluar method with an almost-identical 
name, which might be more popular. (Assuming no obviously popular 
radically different alternative emerges to the current naming scheme)

Note: Some of these links may be accessible only to W3C Members.

Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-110: Do we need a singular method for getting just one element (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-01-28)
  2. Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-02-06)
  3. Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-02-06)
  4. Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from cjolif@ilog.fr on 2007-02-06)
  5. Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from hasather@gmail.com on 2007-02-06)
  6. Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from cjolif@ilog.fr on 2007-02-06)
  7. Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from hasather@gmail.com on 2007-02-06)
  8. Re: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-02-06)
  9. Fwd: Proposal: getElementsBySelector() (from mjs@apple.com on 2007-02-06)
  10. Re: ISSUE-110: Do we need a singular method for getting just one element (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2007-06-25)
  11. Request to Publish a New Selectors API Working Draft (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2007-06-25)
  12. Re: Selectors API - Request for consensus (from derhoermi@gmx.net on 2007-06-28)
  13. Re: Publishing Selectors API (and the %#$^%& names) (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2007-07-26)
  14. Re: ISSUE-110: Do we need a singular method for getting just one element (from lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au on 2007-11-08)

Related notes:

No additional notes.