ISSUE-106 - Public View
Should Progress be required to fire?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Progress Event
- Raised by:
- Charles Mccathienevile
- Opened on:
- 2007-01-27
- Description:
Well, raised by Ian really in his message http://www.w3.org/mid/ Pine.LNX.4.62.0701270726250.21318@dhalsim.dreamhost.com The issue is whether the progress event MUST fire at any point, or not
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-106: Should Progress be required to fire? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-01-27)
- Re: New draft of Progress events (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-01-28)
- Re: New draft of Progress events (from annevk@opera.com on 2007-01-28)
- Re: New draft of Progress events (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-01-28)
- ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107 required frequency (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-04-24)
- Re: ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107 required frequency (from annevk@opera.com on 2007-04-24)
- Re: ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107 required frequency (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-04-24)
Note: Some of these links may be accessible only to W3C Members.
Related notes:
No additional notes.