ISSUE-106 - Public View

Should Progress be required to fire?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Progress Event
Raised by:
Charles Mccathienevile
Opened on:
2007-01-27
Description:
Well, raised by Ian really in his message http://www.w3.org/mid/
Pine.LNX.4.62.0701270726250.21318@dhalsim.dreamhost.com

The issue is whether the progress event MUST fire at any point, or not

Note: Some of these links may be accessible only to W3C Members.

Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-106: Should Progress be required to fire? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-01-27)
  2. Re: New draft of Progress events (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-01-28)
  3. Re: New draft of Progress events (from annevk@opera.com on 2007-01-28)
  4. Re: New draft of Progress events (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-01-28)
  5. ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107 required frequency (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-04-24)
  6. Re: ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107 required frequency (from annevk@opera.com on 2007-04-24)
  7. Re: ISSUE-106 and ISSUE-107 required frequency (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-04-24)

Related notes:

No additional notes.