ACTION-207 - Public View

Check with W3C if we need to worry about licensing for IDL and bindings

State:
CLOSED
Person:
Charles Mccathienevile
Due on:
2006-12-01
Created on:
2006-09-19
URI:
Related emails:
  1. An RDF API for scripting etc (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-10-02)
  2. Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from danbri@danbri.org on 2006-10-02)
  3. Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from danbri@danbri.org on 2006-10-02)
  4. Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from ivan@w3.org on 2006-10-02)
  5. Re: An RDF API for scripting etc (from dwood@softwarememetics.com on 2006-10-02)
  6. IDL licensing (from chaals@opera.com on 2006-12-12)
  7. Re: IDL licensing (from rigo@w3.org on 2006-12-12)

Related notes:

2006-09-21: Email sent 2006-09-20 asking if there was anything we needed to worry about, with default being to just carry on as we were.

2006-10-02: Check, if there hasn't been an official response.

2006-11-17: Chaals re-pinged W3C legal on 2006-11-17

2006-12-12: Stick with document license unless we hear something else...