See also: IRC log
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert-tsdtf/2006Dec/0013.html
CS: choice between bugzilla and moinmoin
wiki
... not sure what level of automation we need
... my impression is that most of group is in favour of bugzilla (although I
don't find it very friendly)
MC: was a fair about of overhead to initially
setup and small overhead as we progress for bugzilla.
... Now bugzilla is working quite well.
... Wiki seems easiest for public but Bugzilla also offers quite good access
to info.
... We're now using a home grown tool in WCAG group because Bugzilla did not
support a few things.
CR: Wiki seems easiest but Bugzill can work too. Don't have strong feelings either way.
CI: Can go either way.
SAZ: proposes using Wiki to start. Easy and
quick to setup with option to switch to bugzilla if problems arrise.
... Can't think of any features that are missing from Wiki and present in
Bugzilla that would cause us to use Bugzilla.
MC: WCAG group tracks issues differently from this group.
SAZ: OK to try out Wiki? (but still give Christophe chance to check with people not on call today)
resolution: (not a formal decision but...)
recommend that group goes with Wiki.
... (not a formal decision but...) recommend that group goes with Wiki.
<scribe> ACTION: Christophe should check with people not on call regarding resolution. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/12-tsdtf-minutes.html#action01]
<Christophe> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/process
<Christophe> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/process
SAZ: need to plug in tool for steps 2 and 3.
... Need to check for correct copyright notice.
CS: Should start entering a few test samples to check process.
SAZ: There were 3 test samples uploaded
already.
... We should cross review the test samples.
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc2.5.1_l1_001.xml
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc2.5.1_l1_002.xml
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/metadata/sc2.5.1_l1_003.xml
CS: Already added links between location and techniques.
SAZ: volunters should take these test files and apply to steps 1,2 and 3 in process. (step 1 is already done)
CI: then post review to list?
SAZ: yes, this is what would be done using Wiki/Bugzilla but we don't have tool yet so use mailing list.
<scribe> ACTION: CR will take test file 1 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/12-tsdtf-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: CI will take test files 2 and 3. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/12-tsdtf-minutes.html#action03]
SAZ: TCDL document has been updated.
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/usingTCDL
<scribe> ACTION: CS will make changes to TCDL usage document that reflect changes to TCDL (location/technique) and make public. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/12-tsdtf-minutes.html#action04]
SAZ: need to have WCAG and ERT to review TCDL status.
<scribe> ACTION: SAZ will post status update to WCAG and ERT lists so those groups can review TCDL documents. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/12-tsdtf-minutes.html#action05]
<scribe> ACTION: MC will try to reserve an agendum item on WCAG call to describe progress of this group. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/12/12-tsdtf-minutes.html#action06]
MC: Posting to mailing list may be missed so
important to bring up on call.
... Will try to schedule agendum but SAZ or CS may make presentation.
<shadi> http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/sc3.1.1_l1_001.xml
<shadi> http://bentoweb.org/refs/TCDL2.0/scx.x.x_lx_xxx.xml
SAZ: Perhaps should be uploaded to CVS (currently on BenToWeb site)?
CS: sure, where?
SAZ: on root level of test samples
repository
... Would like to see real example so prefer first sample (not one with
'xxx's).
CS: OK will use one with real Success Criteria.
SAZ: Would like to see more comments, especially at start of doc.
CS: Will update comments.
... Sample with 'xxx' has more comments and will move those over to other
sample.
SAZ: (jumping back to review of samples) Can you post comments for next weeks call?
CI and CR: yes, should be ready by next week.