See also: IRC log
Francois: how to give intput to the workshop?
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to find out how to give input on the XSL-FO workshop [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action01]
<r12a> in germany ?
<r12a> wish i could go too
Francois: I would like to give input to the WG, rather than to the workshop people
(minutes from last meeting approved)
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to write a mail about possibility for SVG tiny specific IRI tests to martin and the i18n core list (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action02]
see mail from Martin at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2006Sep/0003.html (member only)
Francois: we just wait for Chris reaction, if he does not react, we will follow-up
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to give input to wiki for the LTLI summary (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to send his reply on xml schema to the list (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action04]
See mail at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-core/2006JulSep/0172.html
(Francois describes the issue)
Francois: put this on the agenda for next week
Mary: I will take a look at it
<scribe> ACTION: Richard to send his mail on bidi-override scope in CSS2 and CSS 2.1 to www-international and the style-list, and copy the BIDI-unicode list (ONGOING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action05]
<scribe> ACTION: all to look at charmod resid test suite and gather feedback (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action06]
Francois: also have this on the agenda for next week
Felix: better in two weeks, so that we have Richards input
<scribe> ACTION: Francois to build a current issues list on charmod norm (PENDING) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action07]
<scribe> ACTION: Mary will make the updates discussed in Mandelieu on ws-i18n (DONE) [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action08]
Mary: the udates from Mandelieu are still o.k.
... we need more participation from other companies in the WS
i18n work
... esp. other implementations from other companies
<scribe> ACTION: Felix to look for possible participants (esp. implementors) for the WS i18n work [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/26-i18ncore-minutes.html#action09]
Mary: need to put the editors copy on the W3C server
editors copy is at http://www.w3.org/International/core/ws-i18n/ws-i18n.html
discussion on the status of the relation between policy framework and ws-i18n
Francois: would be good to have one document with clearly separated parts, one on policy, one on the i18n specific issues
Felix: Mary, have you worked on policy assertions for i18n?
Mary: not so far. But is easy to get started with it
Discussion on the difference between "domain-specific" versus "not domain-specific" in the policy framework
workshop HP at http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/2006-Workshop/
Francois: international requirements are a good thing for XSL-FO
Felix: do you think there is interest in the workshop from India?
Richard: maybe
Francois: there have been announcements
Richard: Philippe Le Hegaret is happy with the core charter and the character model charter
... the ws-i18n
charter needs more discussion
... we will recharter before the end of the year or before
... the current naming is:
... "core" for
comments and former GEO activities
... "Web Services Internationalization Working Group" for ws i18n
... and the third group for character
model
... the question is how to name the third group or possibly the other groups
... the third groups would be for spec work, initially
charmod. How should we call it?
... "architecture WG", "i18n infrastructure WG", "i18n deployment WG", ...
(discussion on the meaning of the term "core" - a group for spec writing or review / education?)
(Richard would like to name the charmod WG not too specific, to be able to reuse the name)
Francois: I would prefer "infrastructure" WG
Richard: i18n development WG
Richard will be absent next week