ISSUE-79
Notations
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Clay Redding
- Opened on:
- 2008-01-17
- Description:
What is best practice for assigning a notation to a conceptual resource (notations are codes used in some thesauri and classification schemes)? Do we need some explicit vocabulary for expressing notations (e.g. skos:notation)? Or can it be done using existing features (e.g. skos:prefLabel @art)?
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-79: Notations (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-01-17)
- SKOS comment: Notations (from jakob.voss@gbv.de on 2008-01-31)
- Several emails to reply to (from Margherita.Sini@fao.org on 2008-02-04)
- [SKOS] Issues Review [From Alistair] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-02-17)
- [Fwd: [SKOS] Issues Review (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-02-21)
- [SKOS] Issues Review (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-02-21)
- [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington (from baker@sub.uni-goettingen.de on 2008-04-15)
- Re: [SKOS] Issue owners - preparation for Washington (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-04-21)
- Notations in SKOS (from cred@loc.gov on 2008-05-27)
Related notes:
2008-05-07: RESOLVED: to introduce skos:notation a rdf:Property whose value is a typed literal. The datatype of the literal specifies a syntax encoding scheme and the value of the literal is the classification code from that encoding scheme. As prefLabel is optional, SKOS tools may want to display notations as labels. -- http://www.w3.org/2008/05/07-swd-minutes.html#item01