ISSUE-227
undeclared prefix in @datatype
- State:
- OPEN
- Product:
- RDFa
- Raised by:
- Everyone
- Opened on:
- 2009-09-02
- Description:
Richard Cyganiak: """ Now I wonder what a conformant RDFa parser should do when confronted with an undeclared namespace in @datatype? Ignore the triple? Ignore the @datatype? Assume the empty string as prefix URI? Halt and catch fire? """ http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Aug/0136.html potential resolution: """ Yes, thank you. However, if that value ends up being a non-CURIE, the rules I cited apply and it should be treated as "", which then means it is a literal (not an XMLLiteral). """ by Shane in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2009Aug/0146.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-227: undeclared prefix in @datatype (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2009-09-02)
Related notes:
No additional notes.