ISSUE-188

LAST CALL COMMENT: Felix Sasaki I18N comment re japanese scripts

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SKOS

Raised by:

Alistair Miles

Opened on:

2009-01-27

Description:

Comment by Felix Sasaki in [1]...

"""
I looked at this briefly and have a personal, editorial comment.

You write for example in sec. 5

"The following graph is consistent, and illustrates the provision of
lexical labels in four different languages (Japanese Kanji, Japanese
Hiragana, Japanese Katakana and Japanese Rōmaji)."

I would rather say

"The following graph is consistent, and illustrates the provision of
lexical labels in four different variations (Japanese written with Kanji,
the Hiragana script, the Katakana script or with latin characters
(Rōmaji))."

Since all examples are Japanese and differ only with regards to the script
in use.

I think this concerns sec. 5.1 ("Japanese Hiragana"), 5.4, and 5.5.
"""

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2009Jan/0069.html

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-188: LAST CALL COMMENT: Felix Sasaki I18N comment re japanese scripts (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2009-01-27)
2. Re: Request for feedback on SKOS Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2009-01-29)
3. Re: [SKOS] SKOS Reference Editors' Draft for Transition to CR (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2009-01-29)
4. Re: Request for feedback on SKOS Last Call Working Draft (from fsasaki@w3.org on 2009-01-30)

Related notes: