ISSUE-185

Last Call Comment: Order in Classification Systems

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Sean Bechhofer
Opened on:
2008-10-08
Description:
Raised by Michael Panzer [1]:


5. Order in Classification Systems
----------------------------------

Order in a classification is important, indeed critical. Order is
evident in the juxtaposition of classes, the sequence of main classes,
and the sequence of co-ordinates in a class. Broader and narrower
relationships alone cannot represent order. So, maybe parallel encoding
is necessary to make sure that the system a classification scheme tries
to present is reflected when using SKOS.

To some degree, when order is connected to hierarchy, this can be
reflected by extensions to SKOS. The DDC for example has two parallel
hierarchies, one expressed by length of notation, the other by structure
(notes, etc.). This is handled at the moment by extending skos:narrower.

skosclass:narrowerStructural rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:narrower .

skosclass:broaderStructural rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:broader ;
  owl:inverseOf skosclass:narrowerStructural .

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0061.html

Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-185: Last Call Comment: Order in Classification Systems (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-08)
  2. Re: SKOS comment: Last Call Working Draft (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-08)
  3. LC Comments: Classification Schemes (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-09)
  4. Re: LC Comments: Classification Schemes (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-13)
  5. ISSUE-185 draft response (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-17)
  6. ISSUE-185 new draft response (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-22)
  7. meeting record: 2008-11-04 SWD telecon (from swick@w3.org on 2008-11-04)
  8. [SKOS] Re: SKOS comment: Last Call Working Draft [ISSUE-185] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-06)
  9. [SKOS] Re: SKOS comment: Last Call Working Draft [ISSUE-185] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-06)
  10. [SKOS] Re: SKOS comment: Last Call Working Draft [ISSUE-185] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-04)
  11. [SKOS] Re: SKOS comment: Last Call Working Draft [ISSUE-185] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-06)
  12. [SKOS] Re: SKOS comment: Last Call Working Draft [ISSUE-185] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-06)
  13. [SKOS] Re: SKOS comment: Last Call Working Draft [ISSUE-185] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-06)
  14. [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)

Related notes:

2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept

2008-11-11: CHANGE-TYPE: None

2008-11-11: RESOLUTION: Indeed SKOS does not offer by default a solution to your problem. Usual RDF statements are order-neutral, and only RDF lists can be used to represent ordered groups. In fact we think it would be counter-productive for us to search and propose a solution at the level of property representation (something like "the first subclass of this class is X"). Further, such a use case was not clearly identified in the SKOS Use Case and Requirements [2]. Here, standardization concerns (see note (1)) dictate our not offering a specific solution . Consequently, we propose to *close* ISSUE-185 [ISSUE-185], making no change to the existing SKOS documents. *We hope that you are able to live with this.*

2008-12-15: Closed with no response from commenter.

2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None