ISSUE-171
Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Sean Bechhofer
- Opened on:
- 2008-10-06
- Description:
Raised by Jeremy Carroll in [1]: 11) range of skos:member (editorial?) I take it as deliberate that no range was specified, although the examples are consistent with a range being the union of skos:Concept with skos:Collection. A discussion of the (lack of) range probably should be added to the notes section. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0077.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-06)
- Re: SKOS Comment (various) (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-06)
- RE: SKOS Comment (various) (from jeremy@topquadrant.com on 2008-10-07)
- Re: ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
- [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)
Related notes:
2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept
2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: A similar comment was also raised regarding the range of skos:member (see ISSUE-151). To clarify the intended usage of the SKOS collections framework, we propose to state that the range of skos:member is the union of skos:Concept and skos:Collection.
2008-12-15: Closed with no response from commenter.
2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None