ISSUE-163

Note on transitivity (SKOS Primer)

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Antoine Isaac
Opened on:
2008-10-04
Description:
Raised by Doug Tudhope in [1]

possible typo in 2.3.1 Noteā€”not transitive vs. intransitive: 
I'm not sure this says what is intended? There seem to be too many double
negatives in sentence quoted below
 "Not specifying skos:broader as transitive implies that no new skos:broader
statement cannot be inferred between cats and animals by applying SKOS semantics. "

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0062.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-163: Note on transitivity (SKOS Primer) (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-04)
  2. Re: Last Call: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference; SKOS Primer updated -- SKOS comment (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-04)
  3. ISSUE-163 draft response (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-04)
  4. ISSUE-164 draft response (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-04)
  5. Re: ISSUE-164 draft response (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-09)
  6. Re: Last Call: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference; SKOS Primer updated [ISSUE-163] (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-21)
  7. RE: Last Call: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference; SKOS Primer updated [ISSUE-163] (from dstudhope@glam.ac.uk on 2008-10-26)
  8. Re: [All] Agenda - Nov 18 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-18)

Related notes:

2008-11-26: RESOLUTION: accept resolution to issues 163 and 164 per Antoine's email of 18 Nov; http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Nov/0074.html (http://www.w3.org/2008/11/25-swd-minutes.html) ------------- ISSUE-163: the proposed solution at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0223.html has been accepted by Doug at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0300.html