ISSUE-162

Last Call Comment: SKOS specialisation in SKOS Reference

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Antoine Isaac
Opened on:
2008-10-04
Description:
Raised by Doug Tudhope in [1]:

Does the Reference deal with SKOS specialisation (I see the Primer does)?

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0062.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-162: SKOS specialisation in SKOS Reference (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-04)
  2. Re: Last Call: SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System Reference; SKOS Primer updated -- SKOS comment (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-04)
  3. Re: ISSUE-162: SKOS specialisation in SKOS Reference (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  4. Re: ISSUE-162: SKOS specialisation in SKOS Reference (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-23)
  5. proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  6. Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  7. ISSUE-162: SKOS specialisation in SKOS Reference (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
  8. [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)

Related notes:

2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept

2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: None

2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: There are some examples of specialising (extending) the SKOS data model in the SKOS Reference. For example, section 8.6.3. illustrates the refinement of the skos:related property. For example, section A.4.4.1. illustrates the refinement of the skosxl:labelRelation property. However, a detailed treatment of extending the SKOS data model was deemed out of scope for the SKOS Reference, and better treated in the SKOS Primer. We propose to make no change to the SKOS Reference, can you live with this?

2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None