ISSUE-158

Last Call Comment: Turtle Notation

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Sean Bechhofer
Opened on:
2008-10-02
Description:
From Peter Patel-Schneider [1]:

The introduction uses some sophisticated Turtle constructs without even
any mention of the syntax being used.  At least a pointer is required
here.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Oct/0018.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-158: Turtle Notation (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-02)
  2. Re: personal LC comments on SKOS reference document (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-02)
  3. ISSUE-158 draft response (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-02)
  4. Re: ISSUE-158 draft response (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-02)
  5. Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-06)
  6. Proposed resolution to No Change Issues (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-14)
  7. Proposed Resolution to Editorial Change issues (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-21)
  8. Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158] (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
  9. Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158] (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-24)
  10. Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158] (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-24)
  11. Re: OWL WG LC comment for SKOS reference document [ISSUE-158] (from pfps@research.bell-labs.com on 2008-10-24)

Related notes:

2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept

2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial

2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: The Turtle document is cited and referenced in Section 1.2. There are also brief explanations in Sections 1.7.3 and 9.5. Additional text has also been added to the end of Section 1.7. The Working Group propose to close this issue. I hope this is satisfactory

2008-11-10: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept