ISSUE-151

Last Call Comment: skos:member definition

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Everyone
Opened on:
2008-10-01
Description:
Raised by Erik Hennum in [1]:

"""
Should the specification define skos:member as having a range of
skos:Concept or skos:Collection? Should skos:member have an inverse
skos:isMemberOf property?
"""

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0103.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-01)
  2. Re: SKOS comment (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-01)
  3. Re: SKOS comment (from ehennum@us.ibm.com on 2008-10-02)
  4. Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  5. Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-23)
  6. Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from schreiber@cs.vu.nl on 2008-10-23)
  7. proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  8. Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  9. Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-24)
  10. Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-24)
  11. Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 04 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-04)
  12. Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
  13. ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
  14. Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from ehennum@us.ibm.com on 2008-11-06)
  15. Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 04 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-04)
  16. Fwd: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-11-11)

Related notes:

2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept

2008-11-11: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial

2008-11-11: RESOLUTION: We propose to state the range of skos:member as the union of skos:Concept and skos:Collection. We hope this will clarify the intended use of the SKOS collections framework. Is this acceptable? We have not encountered a requirement for an inverse of skos:member. We propose to make no change, can you live with this?

2008-11-11: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept