ISSUE-151
Last Call Comment: skos:member definition
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Everyone
- Opened on:
- 2008-10-01
- Description:
Raised by Erik Hennum in [1]: """ Should the specification define skos:member as having a range of skos:Concept or skos:Collection? Should skos:member have an inverse skos:isMemberOf property? """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Jun/0103.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-10-01)
- Re: SKOS comment (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-01)
- Re: SKOS comment (from ehennum@us.ibm.com on 2008-10-02)
- Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-23)
- Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from schreiber@cs.vu.nl on 2008-10-23)
- proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-24)
- Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-24)
- Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 04 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-04)
- Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
- ISSUE-171: Last Call Comment: Range of skos:member (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
- Re: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from ehennum@us.ibm.com on 2008-11-06)
- Re: [ALL] Agenda - Nov 04 2008 SWD telecon - 1600 UTC (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-11-04)
- Fwd: ISSUE-151: Last Call Comment: skos:member definition (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-11-11)
Related notes:
2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept
2008-11-11: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-11-11: RESOLUTION: We propose to state the range of skos:member as the union of skos:Concept and skos:Collection. We hope this will clarify the intended use of the SKOS collections framework. Is this acceptable? We have not encountered a requirement for an inverse of skos:member. We propose to make no change, can you live with this?
2008-11-11: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept