ISSUE-145

Last Call Comment: property chains

State:

CLOSED

Product:

SKOS

Raised by:

Alistair Miles

Opened on:

2008-09-30

Description:

Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]:

"""
In the case that you are going to change the spec to /allow/ such chains (it's
an "At Risk" feature): Consider talking about "/Sub/ Property Chains". At least
all given examples are of this kind. This would allow to express such semantic
conditions in OWL 2. (I think it's not very realistic that general property
chains will be part of a future version of OWL.)
"""

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html

Related emails:

1. ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
2. Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
3. Re: ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
4. proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
5. Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
6. ISSUE-145: Last Call Comment: property chains (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
7. [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)

Related notes: