ISSUE-144

Last Call Comment: S44. S45

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Alistair Miles
Opened on:
2008-09-30
Description:
Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]:

"""
Is there a reason why S44 and S45 aren't integrated into a single entry?
"""

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-144: Last Call Comment: S44. S45 (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
  2. Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
  3. Re: ISSUE-144: Last Call Comment: S44. S45 (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
  4. proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  5. Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  6. ISSUE-144: Last Call Comment: S44. S45 (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
  7. [SKOS] Update on Last Call Comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-12-02)

Related notes:

2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept

2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial

2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: Following your suggestion, we propose to combine S44 and S45 into a single entry.

2008-12-16: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: None