ISSUE-140
Last Call Comment: notations
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- SKOS
- Raised by:
- Alistair Miles
- Opened on:
- 2008-09-30
- Description:
Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]: """ This comment is certainly too late, now that the document is in Last Call. But let me at least state that it confuses me to have both skos:note and skos:notation, and they have such a different meaning! Also, I never heard somebody calling the thing discussed here a "notation". I call it a "key", and "skos:key" sounds pretty good, IMHO. ... I don't see a discussion why there is no rdfs:domain given for notations. Are notations intended to be used with every resource, or only with skos:ConceptS? In any case, something should be said. """ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
- Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
- Re: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
- Re: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-22)
- proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
- Re: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-24)
- ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
- RE: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-06)
Related notes:
2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept
2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: We propose to make an editorial change to the SKOS Reference, adding a note in section 6 explaining that no domain is stated for skos:notation. Would this be acceptable?
2008-11-10: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept