ISSUE-140

Last Call Comment: notations

State:
CLOSED
Product:
SKOS
Raised by:
Alistair Miles
Opened on:
2008-09-30
Description:
Raised by Michael Schneider in [1]:

"""
This comment is certainly too late, now that the document is in Last Call. But
let me at least state that it confuses me to have both skos:note and
skos:notation, and they have such a different meaning! Also, I never heard
somebody calling the thing discussed here a "notation". I call it a "key", and
"skos:key" sounds pretty good, IMHO.

...

I don't see a discussion why there is no rdfs:domain given for notations. Are
notations intended to be used with every resource, or only with skos:ConceptS?
In any case, something should be said.
"""

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swd-wg/2008Sep/0044.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-09-30)
  2. Re: Review of the 'SKOS Reference' Last Call Working Draft (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-09-30)
  3. Re: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-22)
  4. Re: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from aisaac@few.vu.nl on 2008-10-22)
  5. proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  6. Re: proposal to resolve remaining no change and editorial comments (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-23)
  7. Re: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from sean.bechhofer@manchester.ac.uk on 2008-10-24)
  8. ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from alistair.miles@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2008-11-06)
  9. RE: ISSUE-140: Last Call Comment: notations (from schneid@fzi.de on 2008-11-06)

Related notes:

2008-11-10: ACTION: Accept

2008-11-10: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial

2008-11-10: RESOLUTION: We propose to make an editorial change to the SKOS Reference, adding a note in section 6 explaining that no domain is stated for skos:notation. Would this be acceptable?

2008-11-10: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept