ISSUE-106
Last Call Comment: TimBL on a few architectural points of RDFa
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa
- Raised by:
- Ben Adida
- Opened on:
- 2008-04-03
- Description:
raised by TimBL in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0297.html
- Related emails:
- ISSUE-106: Last Call Comment: TimBL on a few architectural points of RDFa (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-04-03)
Related notes:
2008-04-10: responded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0069.html
2008-06-09: full response in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0037.html
2008-06-12: ACTION: Partial Accept
2008-06-12: CHANGE-TYPE: None
2008-06-12: RESOLUTION: answered the point on Follow-Your-Nose with XHTML-namespace solution, explained why DTDs are unavoidable for now, simplified language on [default graph]
2008-06-19: RESOLUTION: Move the two items "SHOULD be a DOCTYPE" and "SHOULD be a @profile" from Section 4.1 to a new Informational Appendix "Deployment Advice". Replace sentence "This is called the [default graph]" with "This specification uses the term <tref>default graph</tref> to mean all of the triples asserted by a document according to the <a href="#s_model">Processing Model</a> section."
2008-06-19: resolutions noted in telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/19-rdfa-minutes.html. TimBL had objected in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0098.html. Ralph explains to TimBL resolutions in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0114.html, and TimBL approves in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0115.html
2008-06-19: ACTION: Accept
2008-06-19: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial
2008-06-19: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept
2008-07-09: forgot to mark this closed!