ISSUE-106

Last Call Comment: TimBL on a few architectural points of RDFa

State:
CLOSED
Product:
RDFa
Raised by:
Ben Adida
Opened on:
2008-04-03
Description:
raised by TimBL in
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Mar/0297.html
Related emails:
  1. ISSUE-106: Last Call Comment: TimBL on a few architectural points of RDFa (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2008-04-03)

Related notes:

2008-04-10: responded in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Apr/0069.html

2008-06-09: full response in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0037.html

2008-06-12: ACTION: Partial Accept

2008-06-12: CHANGE-TYPE: None

2008-06-12: RESOLUTION: answered the point on Follow-Your-Nose with XHTML-namespace solution, explained why DTDs are unavoidable for now, simplified language on [default graph]

2008-06-19: RESOLUTION: Move the two items "SHOULD be a DOCTYPE" and "SHOULD be a @profile" from Section 4.1 to a new Informational Appendix "Deployment Advice". Replace sentence "This is called the [default graph]" with "This specification uses the term <tref>default graph</tref> to mean all of the triples asserted by a document according to the <a href="#s_model">Processing Model</a> section."

2008-06-19: resolutions noted in telecon: http://www.w3.org/2008/06/19-rdfa-minutes.html. TimBL had objected in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0098.html. Ralph explains to TimBL resolutions in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0114.html, and TimBL approves in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2008Jun/0115.html

2008-06-19: ACTION: Accept

2008-06-19: CHANGE-TYPE: Editorial

2008-06-19: COMMENTER-RESPONSE: Accept

2008-07-09: forgot to mark this closed!