ISSUE-1
Reification
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa
- Raised by:
- Ben Adida
- Opened on:
- 2007-01-24
- Description:
The concept of reification has been confusing and awkward to use (in RDF/XML at least). Proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2006Apr/0007.html
- Related emails:
- meeting record: 2007-06-21 RDFa Telecon (from swick@w3.org on 2007-06-21)
- [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (from ben@adida.net on 2007-06-26)
- RE: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (from michael.hausenblas@joanneum.at on 2007-06-27)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (from simone.onofri@gmail.com on 2007-06-27)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (from mark.birbeck@x-port.net on 2007-06-27)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2007-06-28)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (from ivan@w3.org on 2007-06-28)
- [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC (from schreiber@cs.vu.nl on 2007-07-02)
- Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC (from Bernard.Horan@sun.com on 2007-07-02)
- Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC (from schreiber@cs.vu.nl on 2007-07-02)
- Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC (from ekendall@sandsoft.com on 2007-07-03)
- Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC (from simone.onofri@gmail.com on 2007-07-03)
- Re: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC (from juth@loc.gov on 2007-07-03)
- belated regrets (was RE: [ALL] agenda July 3 telecon 1500 UTC) (from A.J.Miles@rl.ac.uk on 2007-07-04)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: reification (from ben@adida.net on 2007-07-04)
- [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE (from ben@adida.net on 2007-07-04)
- Minutes from July 3 tcon (from rubin@med.stanford.edu on 2007-07-05)
- Re: [RDFa] ISSUE-1: PROPOSE to RESOLVE (from ben@adida.net on 2007-07-10)
Related notes:
2007-07-10: closed with the following resolution: "XHTML1.1+RDFa does not provide any compact syntax to enable reification. If some RDF-based notation exists for reification, there may be a way to express such graphs in XHTML1.1+RDFa, but the spec will not make any effort to simplify it or provide syntactic sugar."