I can give it a try

csma: Next Meeting: 11 July 2006

<AxelPolleres> +1

<AxelPolleres> ... to accept the minutes

PROPOSED: accept minutes of June 27 meeting

<MoZ> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jun/0182.html

csma: minutes accepted

<sandro> RESOLVED: accept http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2006Jun/0182.html as minutes of June 27 meeting

csma: Agenda amendments?
... no

<johnhall> Can't connect to phone - says 74394# is invalid

Action review [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/4]

<sandro> very very strange, johnhall. :-(

csma: any comments?

3. Liaison

Action review [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/3]

<sandro> csma: Action about PRR draft still open becuase I haven't checked with Fair Isaac

<AxelPolleres> Is SPARQL connected with some action item?

csma: nothing new on Liaison

<scribe> ACTION: csma and Chris Welty to solve the SPARQL liaison problem [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel

<csma> ack ??p13

4. Use Cases and Requirements

Review actions [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/products/6]

<AxelPolleres> regrets on behalf of JosDeBruijn

<AxelPolleres> I substitute for DERI

csma: Is the action on JosDB done?

<AxelPolleres> I think continued

<DavidHirtle> latest draft (I believe):

<DavidHirtle> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/ucr/draft-20060628

csma: any comments on UC&R?
... David sent an email on this

<PaulaP> +1 to remove the link to the CSF and keep the requirement

<DaveReynolds> Suggest leaving in the CSF, update the diagram to match, leave the other CSF's for future iterations

csma: anyone support remove the requirement altogether?
... no reply
... two options, one from Paula the other from DaveR

<StanD> +1 for change diagram

csma: we can ask Frank to change that
... anyone object?
... no reply

<scribe> ACTION: csma to ack Frank to do the modification [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action02]

<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel

AxelP: shall we add a note in the XML requirement?

<DavidHirtle> +1 to Dave

DaveR: we need some mechanism to track things we want to do after the release

<AxelPolleres> +1 to make open issues visible.

sandro: it is more of a design issue

DaveR: A wiki page can do the job
... three items on the todo list
... one on UC 2.5

csma: David

Action on DavidH to add the three items to the consider/document issue list

<scribe> ACTION: on DavidH to add the three items to the consider/document issue list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action03]

<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel

<DaveReynolds> +1 the "to consider list" is small scale and leave in Wiki rather than confuse document

<AxelPolleres> +1 if we add a reference to the to be considered list

<DavidHirtle> I noticed that too, Paula

PaulaP: the requirement is not clean
... under interoperability

<DaveReynolds> Yes, should be linked in I think

csma: we agreed to remove it from the diagram

<scribe> ACTION: on Frank to remove the complain models, requirement from the interoperability diagram [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action04]

<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel

csma: other comments on the doc?

AxelP: some minor issues that I can send to the mailing list

<AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to send a list with small edits by tomorrow night [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action05]

<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel

<scribe> ACTION: AxelP to email the list per some small edit for the doc by July 5 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action06]

<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel

<AxelPolleres> ACTION: Axel to send another mail with issues "to be considered" and add it to the wiki within 2 weeks [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action07]

<trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel

<AxelPolleres> Can someone paste the URL of the issues list?

<DavidHirtle> new issues list:

<DavidHirtle> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UCR/Document_issues

<DavidHirtle> old issues list:

<DavidHirtle> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/WD-DC (section 2)

<sandro> I assume we're not talking about: http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/open

csma: it is not easily accessable
... other comments?
... I wll send an email to the list about the consider list
... for the details

<PaulaP> yes, it is clear

csma: resolution: the WG will publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just discussed

<sandro> that is:

csma: who is in favour of the resolution?

<sandro> PROPOSED: publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just agreed to

<sandro> Sandro/W3C YES

<sandro> Harold/NCR YES

<MoZ> MoZ/Innovimax YES

<PaulaP> Paula/REWERSE - YES

<sandro> PFPS/Bolzano YES

AxelP: is there a timeline for the next version?

csma: between 3-6 months

<sandro> Axel/DERI_Innsbruck: YES

<MarkusK> MarkusK/FZI YES

<AxelPolleres> comment: we should not again postpone comments over more than one iteration

<DaveReynolds> Dave Reynolds/HP YES

<sandro> CSMA(with ILOG Hat)/ILOG: YES

<sandro> Jeff Pan / Aberdeen: YES

JeffP/ABDN YES

<Donald_Chapin> Donald/OMG YES

csma: resolution adapted

DavidH/NCR YES

<sandro> RESOLVED: publish the public draft of UCR with no other modification than the ones that we just agreed to

<PaulaP> no urgent issues

csma: AOB?

<sandro> (David Hirtle is the alternate for NRC.)

<PaulaP> +1

<sandro> +1 adjourn

+1

<AxelPolleres> +1

<PaulaP> bye

This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.127  of Date: 2005/08/16 15:12:03  
Check for newer version at http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/

Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00)

Succeeded: s/Dave/David/
No ScribeNick specified.  Guessing ScribeNick: JeffP
Inferring Scribes: JeffP

WARNING: No "Topic:" lines found.


WARNING: No "Present: ... " found!
Possibly Present: AxelP AxelPolleres Axel_Polleres Christian DaveR DaveReynolds Dave_Reynolds DavidHirtle Donald_Chapin Harold IPcaller JeffP Keep MarkusK MoZ NRCC P0 P11 P13 P8 P9 PFPS PROPOSED PaulaP Sandro StanD StanDevitt Stan_Devitt aaaa comment csma johnhall patranja trackbot was
You can indicate people for the Present list like this:
        <dbooth> Present: dbooth jonathan mary
        <dbooth> Present+ amy


WARNING: No meeting title found!
You should specify the meeting title like this:
<dbooth> Meeting: Weekly Baking Club Meeting


WARNING: No meeting chair found!
You should specify the meeting chair like this:
<dbooth> Chair: dbooth

Got date from IRC log name: 4 Jul 2006
Guessing minutes URL: http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html

WARNING: No person found for ACTION item: on frank to remove the complain models, requirement from the interoperability diagram [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action04]


WARNING: No person found for ACTION item: on davidh to add the three items to the consider/document issue list [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/07/04-rif-minutes.html#action03]

People with action items: axel axelp chris csma welty

WARNING: No "Topic: ..." lines found!  
Resulting HTML may have an empty (invalid) <ol>...</ol>.

Explanation: "Topic: ..." lines are used to indicate the start of 
new discussion topics or agenda items, such as:
<dbooth> Topic: Review of Amy's report