See also: IRC log
<shadi> http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/2006/tests/tests-tf
saz: TSDTF approved by ERT and WCAG WGs
saz: any comments, objections, ideas?
... next step will be call for participation, next week
saz: earl:Software was used as TestSubject or
Assertor
... proposal was to use dctype:Software instead
... some comments by CarlosI
... other peoples' reactions?
jj: I'm fine with using dctype:Software
... DC may change meaning
saz: don't think so
resolution: replace earl:Software with dctype:Software
saz: open up things to be tested by using foaf:Agent instead of earl:Software
ci: why have a specific thing when it is not necessary?
saz: do you want owl:Thing?
ci: no, I want something more general than foaf:Agent
saz: at the moment we have either earl:Software
or earl:WebContent
... do we need something more general?
... e.g. a service provided on the web
jj: if we don't restrict it, I'm happy with it
saz: in the schema we do restrict it
... fix the schema to not restrict?
jj: expand it to owl:Thing
resolution: expand allowable type for test subject to owl:Thing
saz: use dcterm:URI in web content, use
foaf:homepage in software?
... dcterm:URI is not marked stable; but I can't imagine what should
change
jk: could use dcterm:URI in HTTP-in-RDF as well
saz: DC could drop it
jj: don't think they'll do
ci: we shouldn't use dc:identifier
jk: yes
ci: ok
<drooks> sorry, im ok with proposal
resolution: use dcterm:URI in web content
saz: use foaf:homepage in software?
<JibberJim> I think so
jk: ok
<drooks> fine
resolution: use foaf:homepage in software instead of dc:location
saz: titles are misleading
... create only one note including HTTP and only basic RFC822 stuff
jk: yep
... Karl Dubost suggested "HTTP vocabulary in RDF", I'm fine with that
saz: that's pretty precise
... jk will continue on that
jk: rename it and merge the two
<shadi> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2006Jun/0018.html
saz: next meeting next week