See also: IRC log
HST: The situation is not clear enough wrt the test suite to allow us to request the
<scribe> ACTION: HST to try to move Norm's material into the test suite page [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/21-xmlcore-minutes.html#action01]
Comments in the public comments list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-names-editor/2006Jun/
RT: All the comments so far are
about editorial matters, can be done w/o risk before REC
... The only non-trivial one is mistaken versions in some XML
declarations
... There was one comment from Anne van Kesteren asking about
the case of xmlns:xx="", which is not allowed in NS 1.0
... The comment that empty string is not a valid namespace name
invites the question "so what happens if it is?"
... This should be a Namespace Constraint
... But this isn't urgent (it doesn't change the normative
force), propose to keep this as a potential erratum for
later
... Anne is happy with that disposition
<scribe> ACTION: RT to prepare new editors' copies of the two specs with the editorial changes required by the comments other than Anne's [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/06/21-xmlcore-minutes.html#action02]
HST checks, there are as yet no comments in member responses via WBS
HST checks, there are as yet no comments in member responses via WBS
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0040.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0040.html
<scribe> Postponed until Francois is on the call
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-core-wg/2006Jun/0032
No-one has reviewed, please do so before next call!
TLR regrets for next 5 weeks
<tlr> Jose regrets for next 4 weeks
RT regrets for 5 and 12 July
<scribe> Finished early (25 past the hour), we were never actually quorate
HST misread the agenda, failed to discuss this item.