This document:Public document·Annotated document·View comments·Search comments·Add a new comment·Send replies to comments·Disposition of Comments·
Nearby:XML Security Working Group
Other specs in this tool
Quick access to LC-2561
There are 1 comments (sorted by their types, and the section they are about).
I have to revisit this issue, since a test document gh-example.xml (in
the directory "xml encryption test files")
To validate this ECKeyValue element, we need the schema for Signature 1.1.
But this example document might be simply incorrect. I see other errors
which is not a valid algorithm identifer. Is my copy obsolete?
2011/8/19 MURATA Makoto <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> Agreed. Â Thanks.
> 2011/8/17 Â <email@example.com>:
>> Â Dear MURATA Makoto ,
>> The XML Security Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent  on
>> the Last Call Working Draft  of the XML Encryption Syntax and Processing
>> Version 1.1 published on 13 May 2010. Thank you for having taken the time
>> to review the document and to send us comments!
>> The Working Group's response to your comment is included below.
>> Please review it carefully and let us know by email at
>> firstname.lastname@example.org if you agree with it or not before 22 August 2011. In
>> case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for
>> or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot
>> be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection
>> which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this
>> document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track.
>> For the XML Security Working Group,
>> Thomas Roessler
>> W3C Staff Contact
>> Â 1.
>> Â 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-xmlenc-core1-20100513/
>> Your comment on 9.1 XSD Schema XML Encryption Core Schema Instance
>>> xenc-schema-11.xsd does not import xmldsig11-schema.xsd but
>>> rather import xmldsigschema.xsd. Â However, XML Encryption 1.1
>>> normatively references to XML Signature 1.1 rather than 1.0.
>>> Which is correct?
>> Working Group Resolution (LC-2544):
>> The working group decided to not make any change here as
>> xenc-schema-11.xsd does not require any definitions from
>> xmldsig-11-schema.xsd. All that is required is ds:DigestMethod from
>> xmldsigschmema.xsd; so the current inclusion is correct and does not
>> include unnecessary material.
>> Thus the schema import is correct as is the normative reference to XML
>> SIgnature 1.1 (e.g. to pick up normative changes that are not necessarily
>> reflected by schema changes)
> Praying for the victims of the Japan Tohoku earthquake
Add a comment.