W3C

Edit comment LC-1274 for Accessibility Guidelines Working Group

Quick access to

Previous: LC-648 Next: LC-1536

Comment LC-1274
:
Commenter: Andrew Arch <andrew.arch@visionaustralia.org> on behalf of Vision Australia

or
Resolution status:

Comment: In the discussion of baseline and conformance, it seems that there is potential for misuse of baseline [e.g.
authors might be able to just declare their own level of technology, for instance: "requires CSS2 and JavaScript 1.2." The actual/potential audience, not just perceived/target audience or what developers wish they could reply on, should define baseline.

W3C/WAI should consider setting realistic excample baslines for 'everyday' websites in developed/LD countries.

Proposed Change:

Some possible strategies include:

a) to give guidance on what is a realistic baseline for most Internet sites
today, W3C should publish a 'reasonable/realistic' baseline recommended for a general audience;
b) update this 'recommended' baseline annually;
c) place the 'recommended' baseline outside of the WCAG 2.0 normative document;
d) provide an explanation about why the particular baseline is recommended
(space separated ids)
(Please make sure the resolution is adapted for public consumption)


Developed and maintained by Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (dom@w3.org).
$Id: 1274.html,v 1.1 2017/08/11 06:41:25 dom Exp $
Please send bug reports and request for enhancements to w3t-sys.org