ISSUE-59: Can WML be
Can WML be
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- mobileOK Basic tests
- Raised by:
- Ron Mandel
- Opened on:
- 2005-11-10
- Description:
- Based on this current threads about WML I\'m hearing the following:
\"It will not be possible to mark a WML page as \'moblieOK\'\"
Is my interpretation wrong? If so, please correct me. If the above
statement is accurate, this strikes me as a pretty serious problem. I am
strongly opposed to a \"best practice\" of \"Don\'t use WML.\" If it\'s out of
scope, just ignore it, don\'t actively exclude it.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- [minutes] Thu July 13 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-07-13)
- [minutes] Thursday June 15 teleconf (from dom@w3.org on 2006-06-15)
- RE: [minutes] Thursday June 15 teleconf (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2006-06-15)
- Re: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from andrea@trasatti.it on 2005-11-16)
- Re: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-11-14)
- RE: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-11-14)
- RE: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from jo@linguafranca.org on 2005-11-14)
- Re: WML on the desktop (was: Re: WML (from chaals@opera.com on 2005-11-13)
- Re: WML on the desktop (from ph@w3.org on 2005-11-13)
- ISSUE-59: Can WML be \\\'MobileOK\\\'? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2005-11-10)
Related notes:
Closed with resolution on 13-7-2006
13 Jul 2006, 00:00:00Display change log