ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?

Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
Addendum to BP1 (formerly known as mobileOK Pro)
Raised by:
Greg Aaron
Opened on:
2007-03-13
Description:
THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY and its mention of \"one web\" has gotten much discussion
recently. I can see several questions that seem to have popped out.

- What does the \"one web\" principle include?
- Does it mean authoring once for all devices?
- Does it mean using adaptation?
- How much \"one web\" should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY demand?
- Do all entry points have to perform content negotiation to meet the
bookmarking requirement suggested by the BP?
- Do mobile sites have to provide a desktop web experience?

I personally think this is more a matter of clarification rather than rewrites
or anything like that, but it deserves another round of discussion at some near
point.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. [minutes] BPWG 2008-11-13 (from fd@w3.org on 2008-11-13)
  2. [minutes] F2F Meeting Day 2 - 6 November 2007 (TPAC) (from dom@w3.org on 2007-11-12)
  3. Minutes for 07 June phone conference (from mike@w3.org on 2007-06-08)
  4. Late regrets (from rcasar@ibys.net on 2007-06-07)
  5. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-19)
  6. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-19)
  7. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-19)
  8. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-19)
  9. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-19)
  10. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-19)
  11. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2007-03-19)
  12. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-19)
  13. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-19)
  14. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-19)
  15. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-19)
  16. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-19)
  17. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-18)
  18. Re: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-18)
  19. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-18)
  20. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-18)
  21. Re: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-18)
  22. Re: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-18)
  23. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-18)
  24. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from rotan.hanrahan@mobileaware.com on 2007-03-18)
  25. Re: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-18)
  26. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-17)
  27. THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-17)
  28. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-17)
  29. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-17)
  30. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-17)
  31. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-17)
  32. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-17)
  33. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-17)
  34. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-17)
  35. Re: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-17)
  36. RE: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-17)
  37. Re: THEMATIC CONSISTENCY. Let me recap (was: RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified?) (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-17)
  38. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-16)
  39. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-16)
  40. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-16)
  41. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from chaals@opera.com on 2007-03-14)
  42. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from ANEC_W3CRep_Bruno@vonniman.com on 2007-03-14)
  43. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2007-03-14)
  44. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from ph@w3.org on 2007-03-14)
  45. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-14)
  46. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from luca.passani@openwave.com on 2007-03-14)
  47. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2007-03-14)
  48. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from ph@w3.org on 2007-03-14)
  49. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from k.scheppe@t-online.net on 2007-03-14)
  50. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-14)
  51. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-14)
  52. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-14)
  53. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-14)
  54. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-14)
  55. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from paulwalsh@segala.com on 2007-03-14)
  56. ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from dean+cgi@w3.org on 2007-03-13)
  57. RE: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from jrabin@mtld.mobi on 2007-03-13)
  58. Re: ISSUE-188: Should THEMATIC_CONSISTENCY be clarified? (from srowen@google.com on 2007-03-13)

Related notes:

I was thought that this is probably a Pro issue, enough discussion to need review before closing.

Jo Rabin, 6 Nov 2007, 22:31:57

Display change log ATOM feed

Jo Rabin <jo@linguafranca.org>, Daniel Appelquist <daniel.appelquist@vodafone.com>, Chairs, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, François Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 188.html,v 1.1 2011/01/10 15:19:42 dom Exp $