Scribe: Peter Vojtas
Text in braces { } and italics was added by XG co-chairs after this telecon to indicate proposed disposition at 19 December 2007 telecon. This was done to manage expanding Action Item list.
Minutes could not be approved because of a low quorum at this meeting.
Action 1: Kathy and Peter to add citations to the reference list and link them from the fuzzy/probabilistic scenario.
We were not able to connect to a separate telecon on this
topic, so far we discussed it only on mail. Action carried over.
ACTION: (carried from 21 Nov 2007) Kathy and Peter to add citations to the reference list and link them from the fuzzy/probabilistic scenario.
Action
2: (carry
over from last meeting) Vipul to expand one of the HCLS use cases with
types of uncertainty exhibited (using uncertainty ontology as guide)
Vipul was not present. Action to be archived.
Action 3: Peter
to continue working on extraction use case.
In http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/wiki/Discussion
there is a
picture with a proposal of a new "Activity based uncertainty ontology",
this is a basis for work on extraction use case. We have to ask people
to read it and comment and discuss at the next telecon
Action 4: Kathy to work with Mitch and Peter to extend and expand f/p scenario and add graphical representation of fuzzy preferences
Only e-mail exchange on this, so far.
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}Action 5:
Reply to Ken's email concening f2f.
Again, due to heavy work load and small attendance we carry over from last meeting.
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}Action 6:
Authors annotate use cases with uncertainty ontology (carry over from
last meeting).
Authors can annotate use cases with uncertainty ontology as it is or
with some refinement of it or with some other ontology, e.g. the
"Activity based uncertainty ontology" from Ontology
Discussion page
{Reconsider as part
of 19 December agenda.}
Action 7: Mitch, Peter and Kathy to develop a speaker use case and link to ontology.
The work started, we had some e-mail exchange, especialy we have two formulation of task - one with fuzzy preferences and second with utility finctions and multicriteria optimisation. Peter is asking for more detail in the ontology. Mitch says we can annotate the speaker use case and then see whether the current ontology is sufficient (for now) or not. In case not, we can add a few more concepts as we go. But in general, the idea is to just show to W3C where uncertainty comes in.
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}Action 8: Trevor and Thomas to make use cases from their URSW papers
The work has started, Trevor has problems accessing Wiki page and edit it.
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}Action 9: Mitch and Claudia to follow on with the contacts to ISWC-2008 PC Chairs.
Both Mitch and Claudia have spoken with ISWC08 PC cochairs, there was a progress in this action, still has to be continued
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}Action 10: Use case authors write summaries of their use cases.
No progress.
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}Action 11: Use case authors should insert their use cases into draft final report.
No progress, see http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/wiki/DraftFinalReport.
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}Action 12: Matthias to report on Springer volume at next meeting.
Mathias was not present.
{Reconsider as part of 19 December agenda.}However, Thomas raised the following:
Meeting decided not to wait for Mathias and to finish.
none
Meeting was adjourned.