See also: IRC log
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/11-ws-cg-minutes.html approved
Jonathan: Addressing is trying to finalize a F2F + interop event for the week of Jan 16 in Vancouver
<scribe> ACTION: [DONE] Hugo to check with Dan Connoly to find out what has happened [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/25-ws-cg-minutes.html#action01]
Hugo: WSD has commented on SPARQL (or is about to do so)
<scribe> ACTION: [DONE] Hugo to forward WS-I18N announcement to WS Groups [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/25-ws-cg-minutes.html#action02]
<scribe> ACTION: Hugo to (possibly) work on an updated glossary and bring it for review [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/25-ws-cg-minutes.html#action03]
<scribe> ACTION: Put on agenda for next call (Adding semantic to web services technology) [PENDING] [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/25-ws-cg-minutes.html#action04]
Steve: we'll talk about this in 2 weeks time
-- Choreography
Steve: we asked to go to CR, and pending some
changes to the exit criteria, we have approval to do so
... now, we have 1 implementation, and we need to have a 2nd one
Hugo: I thought that there was another open-source implementation?
Steve: yes, but it's an academic
implementation, and it's not clear that it will be up-to-date with the CR
... I know of 2 others, but they're also academic and it's unclear about them
meeting the CR exit criteria
Jonathan: yes, CR can sometimes be tough to get
out of
... we're expecting a F2F on 12-13 December hosted by Oracle
-- Description
Jonathan: we are in pretty good shape, apart
from 2 fairly big issues
... one is about interface-less binding
... it turns out that it's completely broken
... we may have to rip out that feature
... the other one is to fix the serialization specification for the HTTP
binding which is a little fuzzy at this point
... I'm hoping that we won't have to do yet another LC
... I think that we'll have the issues closed by the end of the F2F
... we will get our CR out by the end of the year
... for the RDF mapping, the SWCG has advised us to specify in the status
section that we're not sure about what we're going to do with this
deliverable
-- Addressing
<SRT> Making progress on WSDL docs for async
<SRT> The one big piece left to fix.
<SRT> CR status
<SRT> receiving about one issue per week (usually small and dealt with in-situ)
<SRT> Good progress on test-suite
-- SWCG
We attended their last meeting (see RDF mapping report)
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/21-swcg-minutes.html
<scribe> ACTION: Steve to write to Mark, Mike and Carine about the CG call [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/10/25-ws-cg-minutes.html#action05]
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200510/msg00004.html
<SRT> Clarification of relationships to Choreography, WSDL.
<SRT> Additionally it is if interest wrt to OWL and RDF too.
Nov 9th