See also: IRC log
JL: probably there
CR: probably there
SA: conference confirmed at 17. / 18. Okt
<chaals> [BTW I do plan to come to St Augustin]
JL: fine, hashed would be better than encrypted e-mail
<chaals> So long as teh RDF is fine it seems reasonable to me (I didn't check it, just looked at what you wrote and believed that you checked the semantics of the container)
<chaals> [wrt Assertor]
SAZ: each location defines an instance of in error
SAZ: in each location there are several error
within one context
... where in the schema to place the location property
<niq> looks like EARL formulation of what I call "listed" presentation, which is fine
JK: part of result
<niq> Goes inside Assertion, yesno?
<niq> that's re; location as in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2005Aug/0038
<chaals> Yes, I think it makes sense to have the thing in Assertion. It is also possible to make it in the result, but it seems to me that if there are multiple results with different values according to location they should be differnt assertions, whereas multiple results on teh same location may be distinguisehd by different confidence levels i the one assertion.
<JibberJim> + Assertion too
JK: location better go in Assertion
<JohannesK> niq: I think we will send something about transport and accomodation
SAZ: plug in Assertor / Location stuff in schema, send out on Thursday
<scribe> ACTION: SAZ: plug-in Assertor / Location, send out this week [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/08/23-er-irc]