IRC log of rdfcore on 2003-06-13

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:56:46 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #rdfcore
13:56:53 [em]
but if we dont have a sufficient set of people, not much more we can do
13:58:06 [Zakim]
SW_RDFCore()10:00AM has now started
13:58:13 [Zakim]
14:00:40 [em]
zakim, who is on the phone?
14:00:40 [Zakim]
On the phone I see PatH
14:00:43 [Zakim]
14:00:50 [em]
zakim, dial emiller-bos
14:00:50 [Zakim]
ok, em; the call is being made
14:00:51 [Zakim]
14:01:29 [Zakim]
14:01:42 [em]
zakim, ??P10 is jjc
14:01:42 [Zakim]
+jjc; got it
14:02:27 [danbri]
14:02:36 [danbri]
em, I can't remember all Zakim agenda-mgnt voodoo...
14:02:44 [danbri]
zakim, who is on the phone?
14:02:44 [Zakim]
On the phone I see PatH, Danbri, Emiller, jjc
14:02:44 [DanC]
DanC has joined #rdfcore
14:02:53 [Zakim]
14:03:35 [danbri]
zakim, who is on the phone?
14:03:35 [Zakim]
On the phone I see PatH, Danbri, Emiller, jjc, DanC
14:04:15 [Zakim]
14:04:19 [Zakim]
14:05:08 [jjc]
jjc has joined #rdfcore
14:05:13 [danbri]
(discussion of whether we're quorate...
14:05:14 [danbri]
14:05:42 [danbri]
em: let's wait till 10 past, if no more attending, -> no formal meeting, but can chat
14:06:52 [DanC]
let's review actions from last week.
14:07:06 [danbri]
danbri: jjc, any progress w/ minutes?
14:07:12 [danbri]
jjc: sorry not yet, bad week
14:07:21 [danbri]
14:07:45 [DanC]
actions are in
14:07:47 [danbri]
em: lets convene, do a round of action items
14:08:11 [danbri]
14:08:43 [danbri]
danbri: no movement on rdfs actions
14:08:50 [danbri]
jjc: nor mine
14:09:01 [danbri]
all continued
14:09:08 [em]
all continued... no progress
14:09:16 [gk]
gk has joined #rdfcore
14:09:31 [DanC]
let's not sit around and get depressed about how little we've done in the last week. let's just call it a day.
14:09:59 [Zakim]
14:10:08 [gk]
Oops, got delayed, dialing... (maybe not for long?)
14:10:39 [danbri]
danbri: i plan to spend tuesday on rdfs
14:11:16 [Zakim]
14:12:46 [danbri]
jjc: main task i have for rdfcore is reconstruct Concepts doc, w. input from Gk and merge in issue resolutions.
14:13:37 [danbri]
em: anything we can do to help
14:13:41 [danbri]
jjc: not really!
14:13:46 [danbri]
danbri: jjc, minutes early next week?
14:13:50 [danbri]
jjc: yes, will do
14:14:17 [danbri]
jjc: also ongoing rumblings on xml literal front
14:14:36 [danbri] my suprise and other people's, when asking what value space of xml literal was, it appeared to be string
14:14:38 [danbri]
14:14:55 [danbri]
..on drilling down further, it should perhaps be Exclusive Canonical XML (a technical term)
14:14:59 [danbri]
pat: a tech q
14:15:07 [danbri]
...our typed literals, do they have a canonical form?
14:15:16 [danbri]
jjc: they are their own canonical form
14:15:33 [danbri]
...resolution of reagle-01/2 is such that
14:15:48 [danbri]
..for each thing in value space of xml literal, there is a unique string in lexical space corresponding
14:15:54 [danbri]
(pls check i got that right)
14:16:02 [gk]
I think that's what jjc said
14:16:15 [gk]
But I find it surprising
14:16:30 [danbri]
em-as-staff-contact, can you confirm we're just talking, this isn't a meeting-meeting?
14:16:44 [em]
i can confirm
14:16:50 [em]
were just talking
14:17:05 [danbri]
jjc: 'one of goals was to move some of that stuff into Syntax doc
14:17:14 [danbri]
'we got rid of a lot of nonsense
14:17:20 [danbri]
pat: 'i can delete a whole section now
14:17:28 [danbri]
jjc: 'got rid of wrapping nonsense recently
14:17:39 [danbri]
gk: for all datatypes?
14:17:45 [danbri]
pat: just xml
14:17:55 [gk]
OK, I'm no longer surprised
14:18:40 [danbri]
danbri: let's stick around for 10 mins...
14:21:24 [danbri]
em: where are latest drafts?
14:21:28 [danbri]
pat: url in my latest msg
14:22:17 [danbri]
jjc: pat addressses issues in semantics doc, but issues list doesn't always track that progress
14:28:34 [danbri]
discussion of tying sem doc back to issues
14:30:42 [danbri]
rrsagent, thank you
14:30:42 [danbri]
I'm logging. I don't understand 'thank you', danbri. Try /msg RRSAgent help
14:35:19 [danbri]
em, aspire to REC by
14:35:31 [danbri]
means july 14 for having all docs done/addressed
14:35:47 [danbri]
danbri: you mean that gets us to LC?
14:35:58 [danbri]
oh, i meant PR
14:36:41 [danbri]
em: looking to prepare for both eventualities (2nd lc (just in case), pr...)
14:48:59 [danbri]
zakim, who is on the phone?
14:48:59 [Zakim]
On the phone I see PatH, Danbri, Emiller, jjc, GrahamKlyne
14:55:45 [RRSAgent]