See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 29 June 2010
<Bob> scribenick: Wu
RESOLUTION: June 22 minutes approved
Ram: I have doubt to do the migration guide
<Bob> Due to the large number of changes to the submission specs, and since most of the existing implementation seem to have been based on a dmtf version and not of the submitted specifications, a migration guide was thought to be of little or no value
Resolution: no migration guide will be produced (agreed)
<Bob> gil: eventing no schedule as yet, outline by july 20
<Bob> Mex: Katy - not present
wu: will work with Gil on the primer of eventing
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jun/0012.html
<dug> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jun/0013.html
Bob: short abstract - edits from
Doug
... objection abstract?
Ashok: have some concern on MEX
dug: abstracts were from the specs not new creation
<dug> take all current abstracts except for enum - use Dave's enum
Bob: Resolution: agree to use Doug's for all except using Dave's for Enumeration
<dug> done - in cvs
<dug> proposal: http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/06/wsenum-opt.html
Bob: new enumeration behaviour
dug: it does not seem worth to lose create and pull split
tom: we need a fault to the new context
Ram: o.k. to keep create and pull separately. but allow optional extension
Tom: keep creat and pull separate, but to add a policy
dug: prefer not to do any change to keep spec clean
Tom: is this something that WS-Man can do to add this extension?
dug: yes
Bob: Ram suggests we define additional attributes which are optional, to allow initial pull to be done under these options.
dug: Between these two options, I perfer to move towards more to pull
<dug> A-cwna b-Ram's c-Dug's -s/pull/enumerate/
Bob: A, B, or C vote, you can give preference order
Oracle: a, b, c
IBM: a, c
RedHat: c, a
Fujisu: c, a
Avaya: abstain
Microsoft: c, b, a
Bob: c appears as first choice (win)
Tom: may need related policy assertions
dug: I can take that as editor work and checked by you
RESOLUTION: Doug's proposal at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/06/wsenum-opt.html accepted with amendament s/Pull/Enumerate
<dug> add fault for too many items on first pull, add policy to indicate max items on first pull
Bob: no meeting on July 5th
<Tom_Rutt> dug: why not just have the policy be <0 alowed
<dug> <0 ?
Bob: Next meeting is July 20 (July 13
and July 5 meetings are cancelled)
... check mailing list to review changes that Dug will post
shortly