See also: IRC log
<trackbot> Date: 16 March 2010
<Ashok> cgi-irc:: http://cgi.w3.org/member-bin/irc/irc.cgi
<Bob> scribe: Vikas
<scribe> AGENDA: Agenda accepted without any objection in the working group.
<dug1> FYI - we have wsman folks on the call too - in listen mode :-)
RESOLUTION: The minutes from 2010-03-09 meeting has been approved without objection.
<Dug> +1 to Ram's proposal
RESOLUTION: 8289 resolved with the proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Mar/0031.html.
Accepting Ram's proposal on Health warning
RESOLUTION: Mark all incorporated issue to closed.
<Dug> specs are done
Bob: Any objection to move WS-RA spec to Last call.
<Dug> I haven't had time to read Wu's latest note on this
RESOLUTION: All WS-RA specifications, other than RT, to be moved to last call status.
Wu: Concerns around editorial cleanups.
Bob: Suggestion to open these as new issues and process after last call.
Bob: We are targeting a 6 week review period for the last call publication (from the date of review request)
<Dug> one char change each hour :-)
<Dug> yves - send me a note when the snapshot is done
<Yves> was the ns changed?
<Yves> if not I will do this and commit
<Dug> I haven't touched it
<Yves> ok, I'll do it.
<Yves> cvs updated on my local space, so you can continue to edit :)
<Dug> and 9250
Resolution: No objection to open the new issues
<Dug> mmm, apple pie
<Dug> thanks yves
<scribe> ACTION: Gilbert Proposal for 8273 in two week from today. [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/03/16-ws-ra-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-145 - Proposal for 8273 in two week from today. [on Gilbert Pilz - due 2010-03-23].
Gil: ...explained the issue
<Wu> Implementation Considerations Event sinks SHOULD be prepared to receive notifications after sending a subscribe request but before receiving a subscribe response message. Event sinks SHOULD also be prepared to receive notifications after receiving an unsubscribe response message.
<Dug> this text is a bit different - I think this is about network latency not expires time
<scribe> ACTION: Gilbert Create a proposal for 8832 in one week from today [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/03/16-ws-ra-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-146 - Create a proposal for 8832 in one week from today [on Gilbert Pilz - due 2010-03-23].
Bob: Proposal to remove the reference to wsdl.
RESOLUTION: 8900 resolved with the above proposal.
<Dug> Bob: explains the issue
<Dug> maybe we just a proposal to pokes hole in
<Dug> ACTION: Bob to write up a proposal [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/03/16-ws-ra-minutes.html#action03]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-147 - Write up a proposal [on Bob Natale - due 2010-03-23].
<Dug> Bob appologizes for the issue :-)
<li> baby crying?
<Dug> Gil's head exploded
<Dug> Ram discusses the issue
<Dug> Dug's proposal in comment #1
Dug explains the issue
Li: Soap version is not sufficient, also need binding info.
Gil: Binding info. will come from the spec.
<Dug> woo hoo we're done
RESOLUTION: 8886 resolved with comment#1
<Dug> down to 7 bugs
<Dug> I'm sure there are lots of free hotels rooms in vancouver now
Confirmed May 11-13, Seattle, WA.