W3C

- DRAFT -

XML Schema Patterns for Databinding Working Group Teleconference

15 Jul 2008

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jon Callaine (BT)
George Cowe (Origo Services Limited)
Paul Downey (BT)
Yves Lafon (W3C)
Regrets
Chair
pauld
Scribe
pauld

Contents


discussion of what's required to make progress

pauld: need to reply to commenters, prepare issue list for Basic

pauld: having decided to publish Advanced as a note, we're freer to put more descriptive content

jonc: George, you need more feedback from the WG on the patterns you've prepared

gcowe: that would be nice

jonc: are we happy with the granularity of Advanced patterns?

pauld: I'm mostly interested in Basic, are we comfortable with Advanced?

jonc: I'd like a formal review of the Advanced patterns
... are we confident the Advanced patterns haven't broken the Basic patterns?

pauld: the patterns and examples pages flag up incorrect attribution as red "status" http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/

AttributeTypeReference and SequenceSequenceElement seem to be "basic" but detected as "advanced"

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/examples/6/09/SequenceSequenceElement/

SequenceSequenceElement should be Advanced

AttributeTypeReference looks a little over engineered

concerned there's no canonical example for GlobalElementComplexType

pauld: worried we're going to have to rerun the test report
... if we make wholesale changes to examples such this

<Yves> if we need to add patterns to Basic, we still have the possibility to do a short CR

I don't think this example can be basic thanks to Decimal type

I suspect that GlobalElementComplexType is, however, basic

pauld: propose that the example put in the spec doesn't include Decimal

gcowe: need to rebuild the test report and other pages, seem inconsistent

<Yves> Yves is rebuilding the report

<Yves> => reports done

looking at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/databinding/edcopy/report/all.html

GlobalElementComplexType is a new pattern added by George

pauld: doesn't introduce any new schema elements, but has been flagged as "Advanced"
... which flagging all examples as "Advanced"

This pattern should be "Basic"!

suddenly happy!

I don't think there is an issue, this is in *all* of our WSDL examples echoAttributeTypeReference etc introduced by test framework, therefore "Basic"

draws the WG's attention to: http://www.w3.org/2008/07/soapjms.html

suggest we meet same time next week

pauld: pick up a week today!

Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.133 (CVS log)
$Date: 2008/07/16 09:57:01 $