W3C

Databinding WG Teleconference

19 Sep 2006

Agenda

See also: IRC log

Attendees

Present
Jon Calladine (BT)
George Cowe (Origo)
Paul Downey (BT)
Otu Ekanem (BT)
Yves Lafon (W3C)
Regrets
Chair
pauld
Scribe
pauld

Contents


Administrivia

minutes from last week approved

F2F planning - suggested hotel is full

Jonc: have to drop off at 15:30

George sends regrets for next week's call

chair: let's go to ISSUE-10 and skip next week, then

ISSUE-10: Mapping Element and Type names

Jonc: presents background on rationalle for his text

modified proposal from Jonc: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0023.html

pauld: where would this text go?

jonc: you've pushed for maybe a primer or annotated companion to the document, not necessarily in our spec?

pauld: less text may mean less comments, otoh good text may stave people making comments. This issue is contentious enough to get them anyway.

pauld: so we've three proposals, and there are two parts: the normative constriction and the explanatory text.

jonc: my latest proposal replaces the first one

jonc: i'm ok with the constriction

yves: mostly ok with constriction, but would also like to see the rational as non-normative text

george: ok with the constriction

yves: you might prefer readability and maintainance as opposed to interoperability, maybe this pattern should be a guideline, not normative?

chair: so we're back to it being a "Design Consideration". I'm not hearing consensus. let's park this for a couple of weeks.

ISSUE-2, ISSUE-12: testsuite and identifying a conformant schema

pauld: still working on the report

gcowe: working on the naming convention
... sent paul mail

pauld: thanks, we need to move the ant forward, and the two-phase pattern detection

ISSUE-68: xs:import of Schema 1.0 namespace

pauld: did some testing on this: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0022.html

<scribe> ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]

<trackbot> Created ACTION-66 - Test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [on George Cowe - due 2006-09-26].

ISSUE-67: using xsi:type to assert Type Substitution

<pauld> I can pick up ACTION-63 as business as usual

ISSUE-57: xs:include pattern

pauld: came up with example for Chameleon Include - do we need a separate issue for this?

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xsd-databinding/2006Sep/0021.html

Is this a separate pattern, if so I'll open a separate issue for this?

gcowe: we discussed making stand-alone schemas before, I can look into this

pauld: we also need to double-check we have patterns for all our issues and examples for all our patterns, a script might help here.

Summary of Action Items

[NEW] ACTION: gcowe to test ISSUE-68 example with WebSphere [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2006/09/19-databinding-minutes.html#action01]
 
[End of minutes]

Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl version 1.127 (CVS log)
$Date: 2006/10/10 20:15:26 $